草的生理时钟的进化灵活性:网络约束还是适应性自由?
Leo Douglas Creasey1, Petar Borisov Petrov2, Eran Tauber1
1Department of Evolutionary and Environmental Biology, University of Haifa, Haifa, Israel.
Genome biology and evolution
|March 7, 2026
概括
在Drosophila的昼夜时钟网络显示出显著的进化灵活性. 这允许特定物种的适应,并且似乎不受蛋白质多功能性的限制.
科学领域:
- 进化生物学是进化的生物学.
- 基因组学就是基因组学.
- 系统生物学 系统生物学
背景情况:
- 蛋白相互作用网络对于生物过程至关重要.
- 了解网络进化有助于解释适应.
- 草的昼夜时钟是网络进化的一个模型.
研究的目的:
- 分析Drosophila中核心昼夜钟蛋白的进化和共同进化.
- 调查类对时钟网络内的进化约束的影响.
主要方法:
- 利用101 Drosophilidae基因组项目进行进化分析.
- 进行了编码区域的移动窗口分析,并评估了相互依存的氨基酸演变.
- 利用基于编码子的模型来检测积极选择,并评估类与进化速率的相关性.
主要成果:
- 在时钟蛋白 (例如,Clk,per,Pdp1,sgg) 之间的核酸分歧中发现了显著的异质性.
- 发现了67个共同进化的位点对,特别是CLK-PER,CLK-CWO和SGG-PER之间.
- 在四个基因 (cwo,jet,per,sgg) 中发现了积极选择的证据,但在类和进化速率之间没有显著的相关性.
结论:
- 草的昼夜时钟网络表现出相当大的进化灵活性.
- 这种灵活性可能有助于物种特定的时钟适应.
- 类型似乎并没有对时钟蛋白成分施加强烈的进化约束.
相关概念视频
Circadian Rhythms and Gene Regulation
4.6K
The biological clock is involved in many aspects of regulating complex physiology in all animals. It was in 1935 when German zoologists, Hans Kalmus and Erwin Bünning, discovered the existence of circadian rhythm in Drosophila melanogaster. However, the internal molecular mechanisms behind the circadian clock remained a mystery until 1984, when Jeffrey C. Hall, Michael Rosbash, and Michael W. Young discovered the expression of the Per gene oscillating over a 24-hour cycle. In subsequent...
4.6K
Biological Clocks and Seasonal Responses
41.9K
The circadian—or biological—clock is an intrinsic, timekeeping, molecular mechanism that allows plants to coordinate physiological activities over 24-hour cycles called circadian rhythms. Photoperiodism is a collective term for the biological responses of plants to variations in the relative lengths of dark and light periods. The period of light-exposure is called the photoperiod.
41.9K
Limits to Natural Selection
35.7K
Organisms that are well-adapted to their environment are more likely to survive and reproduce. However, natural selection does not lead to perfectly adapted organisms. Several factors constrain natural selection.
35.7K
Position-effect Variegation
7.2K
In 1928, a German botanist Emil Heitz observed the moss nuclei with a DNA binding dye. He observed that while some chromatin regions decondense and spread out in the interphase nucleus, others do not. He termed them euchromatin and heterochromatin, respectively. He proposed that the heterochromatin regions reflect a functionally inactive state of the genome. It was later confirmed that heterochromatin is transcriptionally repressed, and euchromatin is transcriptionally active chromatin.
7.2K


