Jove
Visualize
联系我们
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
关于 JoVE
概览领导团队博客JoVE 帮助中心
作者
出版流程编辑委员会范围与政策同行评审常见问题投稿
图书馆员
用户评价订阅访问资源图书馆顾问委员会常见问题
研究
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of Experiments存档
教育
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab Manual教师资源中心教师网站
使用条款与条件
隐私政策
政策

相关概念视频

Mechanistic Models: Compartment Models in Individual and Population Analysis01:23

Mechanistic Models: Compartment Models in Individual and Population Analysis

314
Mechanistic models are utilized in individual analysis using single-source data, but imperfections arise due to data collection errors, preventing perfect prediction of observed data. The mathematical equation involves known values (Xi), observed concentrations (Ci), measurement errors (εi), model parameters (ϕj), and the related function (ƒi) for i number of values. Different least-squares metrics quantify differences between predicted and observed values. The ordinary least...
314

您也可能阅读

相关文章

通过共同作者、期刊和引用图与本文相关的文章。

排序
Same author

One-year and 5-year transition risks between major bleeding, reinfarction and death following Acute Myocardial Infarction in England and Wales: A population-based cohort study.

European heart journal. Acute cardiovascular care·2026
Same author

What is meant when we say we are clustering multimorbidity?

The lancet. Healthy longevity·2026
Same author

Missing infrastructure for real-world predictive AI impact.

BMJ health & care informatics·2026
Same author

Prognostic prediction models for psoriatic arthritis in psoriasis: A systematic review.

Journal of the European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology : JEADV·2026
Same author

Response to Holm et al., "On the importance of multiple aspects of cluster validation in multimorbidity research".

Journal of clinical epidemiology·2026
Same author

Opportunities and Challenges in Using National EHR Networks for AI in Learning Health Systems.

Learning health systems·2026
Same journal

A comparison of five statistical methods used to analyse longitudinal EORTC QLQ-C30 quality of life scores in randomised controlled trials: a simulation study.

Journal of clinical epidemiology·2026
Same journal

Sample Size Determination for Decision-centered Pragmatic Trials.

Journal of clinical epidemiology·2026
Same journal

Many multicenter randomized controlled trials do not account for center effect: a methodological review.

Journal of clinical epidemiology·2026
Same journal

Patient Acceptability of the Modified Zelen Approach to Randomized Trials - A Survey of the CAPS THA Cohort.

Journal of clinical epidemiology·2026
Same journal

Corrigendum to SPICE-GRADE: simultaneous processing of indirect causal evidence in complex pathways using GRADE - an exploratory case study. [Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 194C (2026) 112219].

Journal of clinical epidemiology·2026
Same journal

Small numbers of clusters in cluster randomised trials: a scoping review of problems and proposed solutions.

Journal of clinical epidemiology·2026
查看所有相关文章

相关实验视频

Updated: Mar 10, 2026

Identification of Disease-related Spatial Covariance Patterns using Neuroimaging Data
14:27

Identification of Disease-related Spatial Covariance Patterns using Neuroimaging Data

Published on: June 26, 2013

16.4K

集群分离在验证多病态模式方面表现优于其他指标:统计模拟研究

Thamer Ba Dhafari1, Alexander Pate1, Glen P Martin1

  • 1Division of Informatics, Imaging & Data Sciences, School of Health Sciences, The University of Manchester, M13 9PL, Manchester, UK.

Journal of clinical epidemiology
|March 9, 2026
PubMed
概括
此摘要是机器生成的。

集群分离是验证多病性集群的最可靠方法. 虽然集群稳定性有局限性,但评估健康结果关联并不能验证集群质量.

关键词:
分析方法分析方法.集群分析集群分析集群分析隐藏类分析 隐藏类分析多重病态性多重病态性模拟研究是模拟研究.验证验证的时间

更多相关视频

Basics of Multivariate Analysis in Neuroimaging Data
06:35

Basics of Multivariate Analysis in Neuroimaging Data

Published on: July 24, 2010

17.4K
Author Spotlight: Integrated Multi-Omics Analysis for Unveiling Multicellular Immune Signatures in Clinical Heart Attack Cohorts
08:51

Author Spotlight: Integrated Multi-Omics Analysis for Unveiling Multicellular Immune Signatures in Clinical Heart Attack Cohorts

Published on: September 20, 2024

2.2K

相关实验视频

Last Updated: Mar 10, 2026

Identification of Disease-related Spatial Covariance Patterns using Neuroimaging Data
14:27

Identification of Disease-related Spatial Covariance Patterns using Neuroimaging Data

Published on: June 26, 2013

16.4K
Basics of Multivariate Analysis in Neuroimaging Data
06:35

Basics of Multivariate Analysis in Neuroimaging Data

Published on: July 24, 2010

17.4K
Author Spotlight: Integrated Multi-Omics Analysis for Unveiling Multicellular Immune Signatures in Clinical Heart Attack Cohorts
08:51

Author Spotlight: Integrated Multi-Omics Analysis for Unveiling Multicellular Immune Signatures in Clinical Heart Attack Cohorts

Published on: September 20, 2024

2.2K

科学领域:

  • 医疗保健服务研究 医疗服务研究
  • 生物统计学 生物统计学
  • 计算生物学 计算生物学

背景情况:

  • 多病性,即多种慢性疾病的同时发生,是医疗保健面临的重大挑战.
  • 识别不同的多病症集群有助于针对性干预和优化护理.
  • 从现实数据中验证这些集群是很困难的,因为没有一个已知的基本真理.

研究的目的:

  • 为了统计评估三种常见的验证方法,对多病症集群:集群分离,集群稳定性,与健康结果的关联强度.
  • 将这些验证方法的性能与模拟数据集中已知的基本真相进行比较.
  • 确定最可靠的方法来评估衍生多病症集群的质量.

主要方法:

  • 创建了25个模拟数据集,预先定义了多病症集群,不同的疾病流行率,样本大小和噪音.
  • 应用隐性类分析,从模拟数据中推导集群.
  • 通过使用调整的兰德指数 (ARI) 作为黄金标准,将衍生集群与预定义的基准真理集群进行比较.

主要成果:

  • 用卡林斯基-哈拉巴斯指数衡量的集群分离,显示出与黄金标准最强的一致性 (中位相关性:0.641).
  • 通过重新抽样评估的集群稳定性显示出可变的性能 (中位相关性:0.421).
  • 与健康结果的关联强度 (Nagelkerke的R2) 与黄金标准的差异一致 (中位相关性: -0.424).

结论:

  • 集群分离成为验证多病性集群的最可靠方法.
  • 集群稳定性可以是一个有用的验证工具,但它具有固有的局限性.
  • 评估与健康结果的关联强度,虽然在临床上是相关的,但不能可靠地验证集群质量.