超认知和有争议的科学:水化案例
Journal of dental research
|March 9, 2026
概括
尽管有证据,但社区水化 (CWF) 仍在争论中. 第四个争议存在于人们如何信任信息,需要更好的沟通来促进学习和证据审查.
科学领域:
- 公共卫生 公共卫生
- 卫生沟通健康沟通
- 超认知 (Metacognition) 是一种表认知.
背景情况:
- 社区水化 (CWF) 是一个备受讨论的公共卫生干预措施.
- 尽管有强有力的证据证明CWF的有效性,安全性和公平性,但公众争议仍然存在.
研究的目的:
- 分析围绕CWF的持续争议.
- 引入关于公众对知识和信心的评价的"第四次争议".
- 提出沟通和政策策略,以改善公众对有争议的科学的推理.
主要方法:
- 基于对CWF文献的全面审查.
- 应用超认知研究的见解.
- 分析CWF作为有争议的科学,两极分化和错误信息的案例研究.
主要成果:
- 争议超越了CWF的技术方面,包括个人如何评估和信任信息.
- 两极分化和错误信息阻碍了在CWF的背景下更新信念.
- 目前仅依靠证据积累的方法不足以使公众理解.
结论:
- 解决CWF争议需要承认认识论评估的"第四个争议".
- 有效的沟通和政策应该促进认识体系的谦卑和代学习.
- 促进基于证据的审查对于公众对科学问题的推理至关重要.
更多相关视频
12:55Multimodal Protocol for Assessing Metacognition and Self-Regulation in Adults with Learning Difficulties
Published on: September 27, 2020
9.2K
05:48The Adventures of Fundi Intervention Based on the Cognitive and Emotional Processing in Attention Deficit Hyperactive Disorder Patients
Published on: June 12, 2020
6.6K
相关概念视频
Metacognition
955
Metacognition is a conscious process where individuals are aware of their cognitive and executive processes, such as planning before solving a problem or self-monitoring during reading. For instance, a writer may need help with composing a piece. The situation involves a writer who is working on a piece of writing, but while doing so, they realize that something is missing. They notice that their characters lack depth or details. This realization occurs because the writer is reflecting on their...
955
The Scientific Method
70.3K
Chemistry is an empirical science. Scientists often pose questions to understand the chemistry in everyday life and seek answers to these questions. To achieve this, scientists follow a definitive series of steps that together make up the Scientific Method. This approach involves making observations, asking questions, building a hypothesis, conducting experiments, analyzing results, and forming a conclusion.
70.3K
The Scientific Method
274.0K
The scientific method is a detailed, empirical problem-solving process used by biologists and other scientists. This iterative approach involves formulating a question based on observation, developing a testable potential explanation for the observation (called a hypothesis), making and testing predictions based on the hypothesis, and using the findings to create new hypotheses and predictions.
Generally, predictions are tested using carefully-designed experiments. Based on the outcome of these...
Generally, predictions are tested using carefully-designed experiments. Based on the outcome of these...
274.0K
The Scientific Method
66.7K
Research is what makes the difference between facts and opinions. Facts are observable realities, and opinions are personal judgments, conclusions, or attitudes that may or may not be accurate. In the scientific community, facts can be established only using evidence collected through empirical research.
66.7K
Revisionist Views of Adolescent and Adult Cognition
358
A revisionist approach to Jean Piaget's theory of cognitive development has brought new insights that challenge and reinterpret his established ideas. Piaget proposed that the formal operational stage, emerging in adolescence, represents the culmination of cognitive maturity. During this stage, individuals are said to develop abstract thinking, engage in systematic problem-solving, and show a form of egocentrism, believing others are as preoccupied with their behavior as they are...
358
Cognitive Dissonance
37.8K
Social psychologists have documented that feeling good about ourselves and maintaining positive self-esteem is a powerful motivator of human behavior (Tavris & Aronson, 2008). In the United States, members of the predominant culture typically think very highly of themselves and view themselves as good people who are above average on many desirable traits (Ehrlinger, Gilovich, & Ross, 2005). Often, our behavior, attitudes, and beliefs are affected when we experience a threat to our...
37.8K
