确定系统审查证据的确性:对方法论方法的范围审查
Jong-Wook Ban1, Troels Madsen2, Karen A Robinson3
1Section of Hospital Medicine, Department of Medicine, Biological Sciences Division, University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois (J.-W.B.).
Annals of internal medicine
|March 9, 2026
概括
本综述绘制了62种方法来评估系统综述的结论性,帮助研究和临床决策. 了解这些方法可以提高基于证据的实践系统审查的可靠性.
科学领域:
- 系统审查是系统的审查.
- 基于证据的实践实践.
- 研究方法研究方法论.
背景情况:
- 系统性审查对于为研究,资金和临床指南提供信息至关重要.
- 由于现有方法缺乏明确性,评估系统审查的结论性是具有挑战性的.
- 确定审查的确性对于可靠的决策至关重要.
研究的目的:
- 系统地绘制现有的方法,用于确定系统审查的确性.
- 为评估系统审查结果确定性的方法提供全面的概述.
主要方法:
- 在Medline,Embase和Web of Science数据库中搜索到2025年9月.
- 包括描述评估系统审查结论性的方法的文件.
- 从主要参考资料中提取数据,并进行前引文搜索,以确定方法应用.
主要成果:
- 确定了62种不同的方法来评估系统审查的结论性,其中45种有记录的应用程序.
- 将方法分为3种主要方法:数学元分析 (29种方法),累积元分析 (15种方法) 和非数学方法 (18种方法).
- 举例来说,包括防故障数,脆弱性指数,试验顺序分析,推评估,开发和评估 (GRADE) 框架的分级,以及兰德方法.
结论:
- 本综述提供了评估系统审查结论性的方法的全面地图.
- 这些确定的方法可以提高系统审查的可靠性和实用性,以指导研究,资金和临床决策.
- 可能需要进一步的研究来评估不同结论性评估方法的性能.
相关概念视频
01:18The Scientific Method in Nursing Process
19.1K
The scientific method provides the foundation for any research. It is the most reliable and objective of all forms of gaining knowledge and guides in applying research-based evidence in practice and conducting future research.
When using research findings to change practice, one must understand the process used to guide a study. The scientific method is a systematic, step-by-step process that supports the data's validity, reliability, and generalizability. As a result, findings can be...
When using research findings to change practice, one must understand the process used to guide a study. The scientific method is a systematic, step-by-step process that supports the data's validity, reliability, and generalizability. As a result, findings can be...
19.1K
01:23Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches
515
Biopharmaceutical studies constitute a vital field aiming to enhance drug delivery methods and refine therapeutic approaches, drawing upon diverse interdisciplinary knowledge. In research methodologies, the choice between controlled and non-controlled studies significantly influences the study's reliability and accuracy.
Non-controlled studies, commonly employed for initial exploration, lack a control group, rendering them susceptible to biases and external influences. In contrast,...
Non-controlled studies, commonly employed for initial exploration, lack a control group, rendering them susceptible to biases and external influences. In contrast,...
515
01:25Strategies for Assessing and Addressing Confounding
520
Confounding is a critical issue in epidemiological studies, often leading to misleading conclusions about associations between exposures and outcomes. It occurs when the relationship between the exposure and the outcome is mixed with the effects of other factors that influence the outcome. Given that, addressing confounding is of high importance for drawing accurate inferences in research.
Confounding can be addressed at both the design phase of a study and through analytical methods after data...
Confounding can be addressed at both the design phase of a study and through analytical methods after data...
520
01:28Criteria for Causality: Bradford Hill Criteria - II
1.4K
The Bradford Hill criteria serve as guidelines for establishing causative links in epidemiological research. Beyond Strength, Consistency, Specificity, and Temporality, key criteria also include Biological Gradient, Plausibility, Coherence, Experiment, and Analogy. These principles assist scientists in assessing the likelihood of causation in complex biological contexts. Below is a summary of these concepts:
1.4K
01:15Systematic Error: Methodological and Sampling Errors
11.2K
In the case of systematic errors, the sources can be identified, and the errors can be subsequently minimized by addressing these sources. According to the source, systematic errors can be divided into sampling, instrumental, methodological, and personal errors.
Sampling errors originate from improper sampling methods or the wrong sample population. These errors can be minimized by refining the sampling strategy. Defective instruments or faulty calibrations are the sources of instrumental...
Sampling errors originate from improper sampling methods or the wrong sample population. These errors can be minimized by refining the sampling strategy. Defective instruments or faulty calibrations are the sources of instrumental...
11.2K
01:26Introduction to Epidemiology
2.3K
Epidemiology, known as the cornerstone of public health, involves studying the distribution and determinants of health-related events in defined populations and applying these insights to control health issues. This is essential for understanding how diseases spread, identifying populations at greater risk, and implementing measures to control or prevent outbreaks. Epidemiology addresses not only infectious diseases but also non-communicable conditions like cancer and cardiovascular disease,...
2.3K