相关实验视频

Updated: Mar 12, 2026

A Cross-Disciplinary and Multi-Modal Experimental Design for Studying Near-Real-Time Authentic Examination Experiences

A Cross-Disciplinary and Multi-Modal Experimental Design for Studying Near-Real-Time Authentic Examination Experiences

Published on: September 4, 2019

加快数据收集目标的实现:在混合模式的小组研究中减少现场工作时间的实验评估

Katherine A McGonagle¹, Narayan Sastry²

¹Research Professor with the Institute for Social Research, University of Michigan, P.O. Box 1248, Ann Arbor, MI 48104-1248, USA.

Journal of survey statistics and methodology

|March 11, 2026

概括

将调查现场时间缩短到20周,提高了响应率,降低了成本,但没有影响数据质量. 这种加速协议为调查研究数据收集提供了显著的好处.

科学领域:

调查方法调查方法.
数据收集效率数据的收集效率.
专家小组研究小组研究.

背景情况:

序列混合模式设计在小组研究中越来越多地被采用.
首次使用网络的顺序混合模式设计显示,面试完成的速度比首次使用电话的方法要快.
通过这些新设计,缩短现场时间的可行性需要评估.

研究的目的:

评估缩短现场时间对数据收集结果的影响.
确定加快现场工作协议是否可以在达到研究目标的同时实现成本节约.
为了评估20周的实地实验期与标准的28周实验期的有效性.

主要方法:

在2023年一波美国家庭小组研究中进行了一项实验.
参与者被随机分配到治疗组 (20周的实地时间) 和对照组 (28周的实地时间).
现场工作的结果包括响应率,样本组成,面试者的努力,完成时间,成本和面试质量进行了比较.

主要成果:

加速的20周方案导致更高的反应率.
在缩短的实地时间里,采访者的努力较低.
实现了显著的成本节约,对样本组成或面试质量没有负面影响.

结论:

缩短20周的实地时间对于使用顺序混合模式设计收集调查数据是有效的.
加快现场工作协议可以提高效率并降低成本.
未来的研究应该探索最佳的实地工作持续时间和策略.

关键词:

实地工作的持续时间混合模式的混合模式.专家小组调查小组调查响应率响应率响应率社会心理学社会心理学调查成本调查成本调查成本

更多相关视频

Author Spotlight: A Novel Setup to Conduct Naturalistic Laboratory Experiments with Real Human Actors in Scenarios

Author Spotlight: A Novel Setup to Conduct Naturalistic Laboratory Experiments with Real Human Actors in Scenarios

Published on: August 4, 2023

Using Rapid Serial Visual Presentation to Measure Set-Specific Capture, a Consequence of Distraction While Multitasking

Using Rapid Serial Visual Presentation to Measure Set-Specific Capture, a Consequence of Distraction While Multitasking

Published on: August 29, 2018

相关概念视频

Data Collection by Experiments

Data Collection by Experiments

Data collection is a systematic method of obtaining, observing, measuring, and analyzing accurate information. An experimental study is a standard method of data collection that involves the manipulation of the samples by applying some form of treatment prior to data collection. It refers to manipulating one variable to determine its changes on another variable. The sample subjected to treatment is known as “experimental units.”
An example of the experimental method is a public...

Experimental Designs

Experimental Designs

An experimental design is a systematic process that allows researchers to evaluate the relationship between dependent and independent variables. There are three widely used types of experimental design - pre-experimental design, true experimental design, and quasi-experimental design. In pre-experimental design, the researcher compares the data before and after some interventions or treatments. The true-experimental design has more than one purposefully created group, a commonly measured...

Group Design

Group Design

The most basic experimental design involves two groups: the experimental group and the control group. The two groups are designed to be the same except for one difference— experimental manipulation. The experimental group gets the experimental manipulation—that is, the treatment or variable being tested—and the control group does not. Since experimental manipulation is the only difference between the experimental and control groups, we can be sure that any differences between...