相互转换联合意识得分和被遗忘的联合得分:一个十字路口分析
Emma N Horton1, Lauren K Holbrook1, David F Scott1,2
1Spokane Joint Replacement Center Inc., Spokane, WA, USA.
Arthroplasty today
|March 12, 2026
概括
联合意识评分 (JAS) 是一个用户友好的替代方案,用于患者的遗忘联合评分 (FJS). 这项研究验证了JAS对整个部和膝盖关节整形术患者的验证,显示出强烈的相关性和近线性转换.
科学领域:
- 整形外科 整形外科 整形外科
- 患者报告的结果
- 关节整形术是指关节的整形术.
背景情况:
- 患者对人工关节的认识是整体关节整形术后满意度的关键.
- 忘记联合分数 (FJS) 是常用的,但对英语发言者来说可能很困难.
- 联合意识评分 (JAS) 是一个较短的,为部和膝盖关节整形手术患者提供6个问题的替代方案.
研究的目的:
- 验证联合意识评分 (JAS) 作为被遗忘的联合评分 (FJS) 的简化替代方案.
- 评估JAS与FJS的内部一致性和相关性.
- 为将JAS成绩转换为FJS成绩建立一个行人过道.
主要方法:
- 在JAS和FJS之间进行过路分析.
- 包括接受初级全关节和膝关节整形手术的患者.
- 数据是在手术前和手术后6周,6个月和1年收集的.
主要成果:
- 该JAS显示了可接受的内部一致性 (克朗巴赫的alpha:0.76-0.89).
- 在JAS和FJS之间发现了强烈的相关性 (Pearson的r:0.75-0.88).
- 十字路口分析显示了近线性关系 (斯皮尔曼的罗:0.88-0.90).
结论:
- 该JAS是一个较短,更易于使用的工具,用于美国英语患者.
- 在JAS和FJS之间存在着几乎直接的转换.
- 该JAS是评估关节整形术患者的关节意识的可行替代方案.
相关概念视频
Functional Classification of Joints
8.7K
Functional Classification of Joints
The functional classification of joints is determined by the amount of mobility between the adjacent bones. Joints are functionally classified as a synarthrosis or immobile joint, an amphiarthrosis or slightly moveable joint, or as a diarthrosis, a freely moveable joint. Fibrous and cartilaginous joints can be functionally classified as either synarthroses or amphiarthroses, whereas all synovial joints are classified as diarthroses.
Synarthrosis
An...
The functional classification of joints is determined by the amount of mobility between the adjacent bones. Joints are functionally classified as a synarthrosis or immobile joint, an amphiarthrosis or slightly moveable joint, or as a diarthrosis, a freely moveable joint. Fibrous and cartilaginous joints can be functionally classified as either synarthroses or amphiarthroses, whereas all synovial joints are classified as diarthroses.
Synarthrosis
An...
8.7K
Structural Classification of Joints
8.3K
Joints, also known as articulations, are classified based on their structural characteristics, i.e., based on whether the articulating surfaces of the adjacent bones are directly connected by fibrous connective tissue or cartilage, or whether the articulating surfaces contact each other within a fluid-filled joint cavity. These differences serve to divide the joints of the body into three structural classifications.
A fibrous joint is where the adjacent bones are united by fibrous connective...
A fibrous joint is where the adjacent bones are united by fibrous connective...
8.3K
Method of Joints: Problem Solving II
1.1K
Consider a truss structure with frictionless joints fixed to a wall and roller support. If a force of 150 N is applied to joint A, the forces in each member of the truss can be determined using the method of joints.
1.1K
Method of Joints: Problem Solving I
1.8K
The method of joints is a commonly used technique to analyze the forces in structural trusses. The method is based on the principle of equilibrium, which assumes that the truss members are connected by frictionless pins. The forces at each joint can be determined by considering the equilibrium of the forces acting on that joint. Consider a truss structure with two forces of 20 N and 10 N acting at joints C and D, respectively. The method of joints can be used to determine the forces FCB, FDC,...
1.8K
Wilcoxon Signed-Ranks Test for Matched Pairs
561
The Wilcoxon signed-rank test for matched pairs evaluates the null hypothesis by combining the ranks of differences with their signs. It essentially tests whether the median of the differences in a population of matched pairs is zero. Since the test incorporates more information than the sign test, it generally yields more trustable conclusions. This test also does not require the data to follow a normal distribution, but two conditions must be met for it to be applicable: (1) the data must...
561
Kendall's Coefficient of Concordance
1.1K
Kendall's Coefficient of Concordance (W), also known as Kendall's W, is a non-parametric statistical measure used to assess the agreement or concordance between multiple raters or judges when they rank a set of items. It is often used when you have ordinal data (ranks) and you want to see if there is consistency or consensus among the raters. It is widely applied in research areas such as psychology, medicine, and social sciences, where multiple judges are asked to rank or rate subjects...
1.1K


