Jove
Visualize
联系我们
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
关于 JoVE
概览领导团队博客JoVE 帮助中心
作者
出版流程编辑委员会范围与政策同行评审常见问题投稿
图书馆员
用户评价订阅访问资源图书馆顾问委员会常见问题
研究
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of Experiments存档
教育
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab Manual教师资源中心教师网站
使用条款与条件
隐私政策
政策

相关概念视频

Blind Procedures02:07

Blind Procedures

10.8K
Ideally, the people who observe and record the children’s behavior are unaware of who was assigned to the experimental or control group, in order to control for experimenter bias. Experimenter bias refers to the possibility that a researcher’s expectations might skew the results of the study. Remember, conducting an experiment requires a lot of planning, and the people involved in the research project have a vested interest in supporting their hypotheses. If the observers knew which...
10.8K
Errors occurring during blood pressure monitoring01:25

Errors occurring during blood pressure monitoring

1.6K
Blood pressure monitoring is a crucial clinical procedure in diagnosing and managing various cardiovascular conditions. Despite its significance, the accuracy of blood pressure measurements can be compromised by multiple factors, potentially leading to either falsely high or low readings. These inaccuracies are critical as they can significantly impact patient care. So, it is vital to understand these challenges deeply and adopt strategic approaches to minimize errors.
Several factors...
1.6K
Pharmacovigilance01:19

Pharmacovigilance

2.0K
Post-marketing surveillance is a critical component of pharmaceutical regulation, often uncovering unanticipated adverse drug reactions (ADRs) once a drug is widely used over an extended period.
This process, termed pharmacovigilance, aims to detect, evaluate, and minimize harmful effects related to medication use. The data collection for pharmacovigilance depends on spontaneous reporting systems, where healthcare professionals or patients voluntarily report suspected ADRs.
In some cases, there...
2.0K
Systematic Error: Methodological and Sampling Errors01:15

Systematic Error: Methodological and Sampling Errors

8.7K
In the case of systematic errors, the sources can be identified, and the errors can be subsequently minimized by addressing these sources. According to the source, systematic errors can be divided into sampling, instrumental, methodological, and personal errors.
Sampling errors originate from improper sampling methods or the wrong sample population. These errors can be minimized by refining the sampling strategy. Defective instruments or faulty calibrations are the sources of instrumental...
8.7K
Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches01:23

Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches

631
Biopharmaceutical studies constitute a vital field aiming to enhance drug delivery methods and refine therapeutic approaches, drawing upon diverse interdisciplinary knowledge. In research methodologies, the choice between controlled and non-controlled studies significantly influences the study's reliability and accuracy.
Non-controlled studies, commonly employed for initial exploration, lack a control group, rendering them susceptible to biases and external influences. In contrast,...
631
Bioavailability Study Design: Single Versus Multiple Dose Studies01:11

Bioavailability Study Design: Single Versus Multiple Dose Studies

388
Bioavailability studies are essential for understanding how a drug is absorbed, distributed, metabolized, and excreted in the body. These studies assess the extent and rate at which the active pharmaceutical agent becomes available at the site of action. The design of bioavailability studies can involve single-dose or multiple-dose regimens, each with distinct advantages and limitations.Single-dose studies are the preferred approach due to their simplicity and reduced drug exposure for...
388

您也可能阅读

相关文章

通过共同作者、期刊和引用图与本文相关的文章。

排序
Same author

Implementation evaluation of nurse-initiated care in 29 Australian emergency departments: a RE-AIM multi-method evaluation.

Implementation science : IS·2026
Same author

Genomic epidemiology to investigate the origins and zoonotic implications of antibiotic-resistant <i>Escherichia coli</i> on beef and lamb meat sold by independent butchers in Wales.

One health (Amsterdam, Netherlands)·2026
Same author

Amputations in Sepsis Patients: A Population-Based Cohort Study of Rates and Risk Factors.

ANZ journal of surgery·2026
Same author

Corrigendum to 'Infection-related hospital readmissions after surviving sepsis: A retrospective population level study of adult sepsis survivors in Australia' [Journal of Critical Care 93 (2026) 155443].

Journal of critical care·2026
Same author

Characteristics of Patients Accessing Outpatient Oncology Services Virtually and Predictors of Subsequent Unplanned Emergency Department Presentations in 78,323 Adults in Australia: Retrospective Cohort Study.

Journal of medical Internet research·2026
Same author

Does the accuracy of medication administration documentation improve with electronic medication systems? A stepped-wedge cluster randomised trial.

BMJ health & care informatics·2026

相关实验视频

Updated: May 5, 2026

Improving IV Insulin Administration in a Community Hospital
12:08

Improving IV Insulin Administration in a Community Hospital

Published on: June 11, 2012

19.5K

在药物管理错误检测方面,独立的双重检查是否优于单次检查? 一个随机对照模拟试验.

Johanna I Westbrook1, Ryan Daniel McMullan2, Erin Fitzpatrick2

  • 1Centre for Health Systems and Safety Research, Australian Institute of Health Innovation, Macquarie University Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Macquarie University, New South Wales, Australia Johanna.westbrook@mq.edu.au.

BMJ quality & safety
|March 13, 2026
PubMed
概括

独立双重检查 (IDC) 改善了经验丰富的护士的药物错误检测,但并没有改善早期职业护士的药物错误检测. 这种安全实践耗时,容易导致社会散,这表明替代策略可能更有效.

关键词:
人类因素 人类因素药物的安全性 药物的安全性护士是一个护士.患者安全 患者安全

更多相关视频

Failure of Cleaning Verification in Pharmaceutical Industry Due to Uncleanliness of Stainless Steel Surface
07:00

Failure of Cleaning Verification in Pharmaceutical Industry Due to Uncleanliness of Stainless Steel Surface

Published on: August 11, 2017

8.7K
Quadruple-Checkerboard: A Modification of the Three-Dimensional Checkerboard for Studying Drug Combinations
11:15

Quadruple-Checkerboard: A Modification of the Three-Dimensional Checkerboard for Studying Drug Combinations

Published on: July 24, 2021

5.6K

相关实验视频

Last Updated: May 5, 2026

Improving IV Insulin Administration in a Community Hospital
12:08

Improving IV Insulin Administration in a Community Hospital

Published on: June 11, 2012

19.5K
Failure of Cleaning Verification in Pharmaceutical Industry Due to Uncleanliness of Stainless Steel Surface
07:00

Failure of Cleaning Verification in Pharmaceutical Industry Due to Uncleanliness of Stainless Steel Surface

Published on: August 11, 2017

8.7K
Quadruple-Checkerboard: A Modification of the Three-Dimensional Checkerboard for Studying Drug Combinations
11:15

Quadruple-Checkerboard: A Modification of the Three-Dimensional Checkerboard for Studying Drug Combinations

Published on: July 24, 2021

5.6K

科学领域:

  • 护理 护理 护理
  • 患者安全 患者安全
  • 药物管理 药物管理

背景情况:

  • 独立双重检查 (IDC) 是医院常见的药物管理安全实践.
  • 与单个护士检查相比,IDC在错误检测中的有效性缺乏经验证据.

研究的目的:

  • 为了比较IDC与单次检查在检测药物错误方面的有效性.
  • 评估每种方法所需的时间.
  • 探索影响绩效的因素,包括护士经验和社会动态.

主要方法:

  • 一个多中心随机对照模拟试验,涉及两个儿科医院的82名护士.
  • 护士在单次检查和IDC条件下进行药物管理.
  • 主要结果包括错误检测率和所需的时间;二次分析检查了护士经验和社会散.

主要成果:

  • 总体而言,IDC的错误检测率比单次检查高11%,但这种好处仅对经验丰富的护士有意义.
  • 职业生涯早期的护士在IDC方面没有显著改善,并且表现出社会惰.
  • 根据IDC的说法,每组药物需要的时间要长得多.

结论:

  • IDC不是普遍有效的,在药物错误检测方面显示出不一致的好处.
  • 它的资源需求和易受社会浪费的影响表明,它可能不适合作为通用安全战略.
  • 加强单一检查能力和临床判断可能为药物安全提供更有效的方法.