评估4个不同的线在一个样本的牙科线无知的学生:一个随机对照试验
Simeone Davide1, Marcattili Domenico1, Casalena Fabio1
1Department of Life, Health and Environmental Sciences, University of L'Aquila, L'Aquila, Italy.
概括
与聚胺或聚糖酸等替代品相比,丝并没有提供更好的处理或性能. 牙科学校应将各种材料纳入培训,以提高学生的外科技能和伤口愈合结果.
科学领域:
- 在口腔外科手术.
- 牙科教育 牙科教育
- 生物材料科学 生物材料科学
背景情况:
- 刺显著影响口腔外科手术伤口愈合.
- 简单的间断,通常是丝,由于易用性和成本,牙科新手常见.
- 替代材料可能适合经验较少的医生.
研究的目的:
- 为了比较丝与替代材料 (聚胺,聚甘酸,聚四乙烯) 的处理和性能,对于初学者牙科学生.
- 在模拟的外科环境中评估对接材料的主观和客观反.
主要方法:
- 没有先前经验的牙科学生 (主观的n=101,客观的n=60) 在猪半上测试了四种接材料.
- 通过利克特尺度问卷进行主观反,评估了处理,节点安全性和易于移除.
- 通过基于欧安组织的关键接阶段的评估来评估目标绩效.
主要成果:
- 在统计学上显著的差异 (p < 0.05) 偏好替代材料比丝在组织通道阻力,机动性,结的执行和片的近似性.
- 丝在任何测试领域都没有超过任何替代材料.
- 在整体处理或性能方面没有发现显著差异,有利于丝.
结论:
- 与聚胺,聚甘酸或聚四乙烯相比,丝并没有提供更好的处理能力或性能.
- 牙科培训课程应包含各种接材料,以提高学生的技术能力和外科手术成果.
相关概念视频
Cross-Sectional Research
11.5K
In cross-sectional research, a researcher compares multiple segments of the population at the same time. If they were interested in people's dietary habits, the researcher might directly compare different groups of people by age. Instead of following a group of people for 20 years to see how their dietary habits changed from decade to decade, the researcher would study a group of 20-year-old individuals and compare them to a group of 30-year-old individuals and a group of 40-year-old...
11.5K
Group Design
9.3K
The most basic experimental design involves two groups: the experimental group and the control group. The two groups are designed to be the same except for one difference— experimental manipulation. The experimental group gets the experimental manipulation—that is, the treatment or variable being tested—and the control group does not. Since experimental manipulation is the only difference between the experimental and control groups, we can be sure that any differences between...
9.3K
Blind Procedures
10.8K
Ideally, the people who observe and record the children’s behavior are unaware of who was assigned to the experimental or control group, in order to control for experimenter bias. Experimenter bias refers to the possibility that a researcher’s expectations might skew the results of the study. Remember, conducting an experiment requires a lot of planning, and the people involved in the research project have a vested interest in supporting their hypotheses. If the observers knew which...
10.8K
Random Sampling Method
11.9K
Sampling is a technique to select a portion (or subset) of the larger population and study that portion (the sample) to gain information about the population. Data are the result of sampling from a population. The sampling method ensures that samples are drawn without bias and accurately represent the population. Because measuring the entire population in a study is not practical, researchers use samples to represent the population of interest. Among the various sampling methods used by...
11.9K
Multiple Comparison Tests
3.5K
Multiple comparison test, abbreviated as MCT, is a post hoc analysis generally performed after comparing multiple samples with one or more tests. An MCT will help identify a significantly different sample among multiple samples or a factor among multiple factors.
It would be easy to compare two samples using a significance alpha level of 0.05. In other words, there is only one sample pair to be compared. However, it would be difficult to identify a significantly different sample if the number...
It would be easy to compare two samples using a significance alpha level of 0.05. In other words, there is only one sample pair to be compared. However, it would be difficult to identify a significantly different sample if the number...
3.5K
Blinding
3.0K
Blinding is a commonly used method of not telling participants which treatment a subject is receiving. Blinding is a critical part of a randomized control trial or RCT. It reduces the bias that affects the results. In an RCT, blinding is used in the form of a placebo. A placebo effect occurs when untreated subjects falsely believe they have received the treatment and report improved symptoms. A placebo or a dummy treatment is administered to subjects to negate the bias caused by such an effect.
3.0K


