Jove
Visualize
联系我们
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
关于 JoVE
概览领导团队博客JoVE 帮助中心
作者
出版流程编辑委员会范围与政策同行评审常见问题投稿
图书馆员
用户评价订阅访问资源图书馆顾问委员会常见问题
研究
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of Experiments存档
教育
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab Manual教师资源中心教师网站
使用条款与条件
隐私政策
政策

相关概念视频

Ligand Binding Sites02:40

Ligand Binding Sites

15.6K
Proteins are dynamic macromolecules that carry out a wide variety of essential processes; however, the activities of most proteins depend on their interactions with other molecules or ions, known as ligands.
Protein-ligand interactions are quite specific; even though numerous potential ligands surround a cellular protein at any given time, only a particular ligand can bind to that protein. Moreover, a ligand binds only to a dedicated area on the surface of the protein, known as the...
15.6K
Ligand Binding Sites02:40

Ligand Binding Sites

9.0K
9.0K
Conserved Binding Sites01:49

Conserved Binding Sites

5.3K
Many proteins’ biological role depends on their interactions with their ligands, small molecules that bind to specific locations on the protein known as ligand-binding sites. Ligand-binding sites are often conserved among homologous proteins as these sites are critical for protein function.
Binding sites are often located in large pockets, and if their location on a protein’s surface is unknown, it can be predicted using various approaches. The energetic method computationally...
5.3K
Ligand Binding and Linkage00:49

Ligand Binding and Linkage

5.9K
Allosteric proteins have more than one ligand binding site; the binding of a ligand to any of these sites influences the binding of ligands to the other sites. When a protein is allosteric, its binding sites are called coupled or linked.  In the case of enzymes, the site that binds to the substrate is known as the active site and the other site is known as the regulatory site. When a ligand binds to the regulatory site, this leads to conformational changes in the protein that can influence...
5.9K
Ligand Binding and Linkage00:49

Ligand Binding and Linkage

4.2K
4.2K
The Equilibrium Binding Constant and Binding Strength02:18

The Equilibrium Binding Constant and Binding Strength

15.5K
The equilibrium binding constant (Kb) quantifies the strength of a protein-ligand interaction. Kb can be calculated as follows when the reaction is at equilibrium:
15.5K

您也可能阅读

相关文章

通过共同作者、期刊和引用图与本文相关的文章。

排序
Same author

The correlation between the deterioration of microstructural evolution and mechanical properties in human ascending aortas with and without dissections.

Acta biomaterialia·2026
Same author

Experiences and Perspectives of Nursing Students and Educators on Artificial Intelligence in Nursing Education: A Qualitative Systematic Review and Meta-Synthesis.

Nurse educator·2026
Same author

Balloon Pulmonary Angioplasty for Chronic Thromboembolic Pulmonary Hypertension: Patient Selection, Procedural Pearls, and Expected Outcomes.

Seminars in interventional radiology·2025
Same author

The two-component nuclease-active KELShedu system confers broad antiphage activity via abortive infection.

Science advances·2025
Same author

Efficacy and safety of 570/590 Nm yellow light combined with red light and infrared LED in treating facial skin photoaging: A Single-Center, randomized Controlled, exploratory study.

Lasers in medical science·2025
Same author

Study on Nano-Grinding Characteristics and Formation Mechanism of Subsurface Damage in Monocrystalline Silicon.

Micromachines·2025

相关实验视频

Updated: Mar 16, 2026

Author Spotlight: Streamlining Protein Target Prediction and Validation via Molecular Docking and CETSA
10:21

Author Spotlight: Streamlining Protein Target Prediction and Validation via Molecular Docking and CETSA

Published on: February 23, 2024

3.9K

基于分子嵌入的算法选择在蛋白质-配体对接中.

Jiabao Brad Wang1, Siyuan Cao1, Hongxuan Wu1

  • 1Division of Natural and Applied Sciences, Duke Kunshan University, 8 Duke Av., Suzhou, 215316, Jiangsu, China.

Journal of cheminformatics
|March 15, 2026
PubMed
概括

一个新的算法选择模型MolAS通过预测每个算法的有效性来提高分子对接性能. 它比单一最佳解决方案 (SBS) 提供了显著的优势,并有助于缩小与虚拟最佳解决方案 (VBS) 的差距.

关键词:
选择算法的算法选择.化学信息学 化学信息学对接基准的对接基准.分子嵌入的分子嵌入.位置评估 位置评估蛋白质 - 合物对接

更多相关视频

Incorporating Target Protein Structure Flexibility and Dynamics in Computational Drug Discovery Using Ensemble-Based Docking Analysis
08:49

Incorporating Target Protein Structure Flexibility and Dynamics in Computational Drug Discovery Using Ensemble-Based Docking Analysis

Published on: June 20, 2025

1.5K
Application of I TASSER, trRosetta, UCSF Chimera, HADDOCK server, and HEX loria for De Novo and In Silico Design of Proteins
05:08

Application of I TASSER, trRosetta, UCSF Chimera, HADDOCK server, and HEX loria for De Novo and In Silico Design of Proteins

Published on: July 8, 2025

1.3K

相关实验视频

Last Updated: Mar 16, 2026

Author Spotlight: Streamlining Protein Target Prediction and Validation via Molecular Docking and CETSA
10:21

Author Spotlight: Streamlining Protein Target Prediction and Validation via Molecular Docking and CETSA

Published on: February 23, 2024

3.9K
Incorporating Target Protein Structure Flexibility and Dynamics in Computational Drug Discovery Using Ensemble-Based Docking Analysis
08:49

Incorporating Target Protein Structure Flexibility and Dynamics in Computational Drug Discovery Using Ensemble-Based Docking Analysis

Published on: June 20, 2025

1.5K
Application of I TASSER, trRosetta, UCSF Chimera, HADDOCK server, and HEX loria for De Novo and In Silico Design of Proteins
05:08

Application of I TASSER, trRosetta, UCSF Chimera, HADDOCK server, and HEX loria for De Novo and In Silico Design of Proteins

Published on: July 8, 2025

1.3K

科学领域:

  • 计算化学是一种计算化学.
  • 药物发现 药物发现
  • 在生物信息学中的机器学习.

背景情况:

  • 分子对接算法的选择是具有挑战性的,因为其依赖于上下文的性能.
  • 没有单一的算法可靠地在所有结构,化学和协议变异中执行.
  • 现有的方法往往缺乏适应性和通用性.

研究的目的:

  • 介绍MolAS,一个轻量级的算法选择模型用于分子对接.
  • 使用预训的蛋白质和连接体嵌入来预测每个算法的性能.
  • 为了提高单一最佳解决方案 (SBS) 的性能,并接近虚拟最佳解决方案 (VBS) 的性能.

主要方法:

  • 使用预训练的蛋白质和带嵌入物.
  • 使用注意力聚合和浅余解码器来预测性能.
  • 在五个分子对接基准中评估了MolAS,其中有数百到数千个标记的复合体.

主要成果:

  • 莫拉斯比单一最佳解决器 (SBS) 取得了高达15个百分点的绝对改进.
  • 该模型缩小了虚拟最佳解决者 (VBS) 和SBS之间的差距的17-66%.
  • 性能在低Oracle和可分离的顶部解决器区域最有效,但在协议不匹配下退化.

结论:

  • 莫拉斯提供了一个强大的,基于嵌入的方法来选择对接算法.
  • 它的有效性与预言景观特征和协议稳定性有关.
  • 该模型作为域内选择器和诊断工具来评估选择的正确性.