Jove
Visualize
联系我们
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
关于 JoVE
概览领导团队博客JoVE 帮助中心
作者
出版流程编辑委员会范围与政策同行评审常见问题投稿
图书馆员
用户评价订阅访问资源图书馆顾问委员会常见问题
研究
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of Experiments存档
教育
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab Manual教师资源中心教师网站
使用条款与条件
隐私政策
政策

相关概念视频

Cause and Effect01:53

Cause and Effect

12.7K
While variables are sometimes correlated because one does cause the other, it could also be that some other factor, a confounding variable, is actually causing the systematic movement in our variables of interest. For instance, as sales in ice cream increase, so does the overall rate of crime. Is it possible that indulging in your favorite flavor of ice cream could send you on a crime spree? Or, after committing crime do you think you might decide to treat yourself to a cone?
12.7K
Hindsight Biases01:12

Hindsight Biases

4.5K
Hindsight bias leads you to believe that the event you just experienced was predictable, even though it really wasn’t. In other words, you knew all along that things would turn out the way they did. Can you relate this to the phrase "Hindsight is 20/20" now? 
4.5K
Causality in Epidemiology01:21

Causality in Epidemiology

1.9K
Causality or causation is a fundamental concept in epidemiology, vital for understanding the relationships between various factors and health outcomes. Despite its importance, there's no single, universally accepted definition of causality within the discipline. Drawing from a systematic review, causality in epidemiology encompasses several definitions, including production, necessary and sufficient, sufficient-component, counterfactual, and probabilistic models. Each has its strengths and...
1.9K
Strategies for Assessing and Addressing Confounding01:25

Strategies for Assessing and Addressing Confounding

521
Confounding is a critical issue in epidemiological studies, often leading to misleading conclusions about associations between exposures and outcomes. It occurs when the relationship between the exposure and the outcome is mixed with the effects of other factors that influence the outcome. Given that, addressing confounding is of high importance for drawing accurate inferences in research.
Confounding can be addressed at both the design phase of a study and through analytical methods after data...
521
Counterfactual Thinking01:19

Counterfactual Thinking

326
Counterfactual thinking is a cognitive process wherein individuals mentally reconstruct alternative versions of past events, often beginning with “what if” or “if only.” This reflective mechanism plays a significant role in shaping emotional experiences and guiding future behavior. Though typically triggered by unfavorable or unexpected outcomes, counterfactual thinking can also emerge in mundane, everyday decisions and experiences, revealing its deep entrenchment in...
326
Halo Effect01:27

Halo Effect

621
The halo effect is a cognitive bias in which an individual's overall impression influences judgments about their specific traits. This psychological phenomenon leads people to associate positive characteristics with those they perceive as generally good and negative characteristics with those they view as bad. This effect is particularly influential in social perception, professional evaluations, and decision-making processes.The Psychological Basis of the Halo EffectThe halo effect is rooted...
621

您也可能阅读

相关文章

通过共同作者、期刊和引用图与本文相关的文章。

排序
Same author

The impact of triglyceride-glucose index on short-term prognosis in patients with acute myocarditis.

BMC cardiovascular disorders·2026
Same author

Iron overload in the tumor microenvironment induces CD8<sup>+</sup> T cell ferroptosis and dysfunction.

Nature communications·2026
Same author

Associations between aggregate index of systemic inflammation and endometriosis risk utilizing logistic regression analysis.

Frontiers in medicine·2026
Same author

Personalized prediction of initial valproic acid dose in children with epilepsy using machine learning techniques.

International journal of clinical pharmacy·2026
Same author

Social Support and Family Resilience Among Young and Middle-aged Patients with Coronary Heart Disease: The Mediating Role of Sense of Coherence and Coping Styles.

The Journal of cardiovascular nursing·2026
Same author

Polyphenols from sauce-flavor distiller's grains: Improving the fecal microbial structure and intestinal barrier function.

Food research international (Ottawa, Ont.)·2026

相关实验视频

Updated: May 5, 2026

Pavlovian Conditioned Approach Training in Rats
06:57

Pavlovian Conditioned Approach Training in Rats

Published on: February 4, 2016

10.7K

CIRCUS:一个基于因果干预的框架,用于在训练有素的分类器中增强反事实公平性.

Qifen Yang, Yuhui Deng, Jiande Huang

    IEEE transactions on neural networks and learning systems
    |March 16, 2026
    PubMed
    概括

    这项研究引入了一个新的框架,CIRCUS,以减少使用因果推理的人工智能模型中的偏见. 通过纠正基于敏感属性的预测,CIRCUS提高了模型公平性,提高了对AI的社会信任.

    科学领域:

    • 人工智能的人工智能
    • 机器学习 机器学习
    • 因果推理因果推理

    背景情况:

    • 确保人工智能模型的公平性和减轻偏见对于社会接受至关重要,特别是在敏感应用中.
    • 基于因果推理的反事实公平是一个突出的公平概念,需要在修改后的敏感属性中进行一致的预测.
    • 由于同时生成过程,现有的方法往往缺乏结构因果模型 (SCM) 的忠实性.

    研究的目的:

    • 通过因果干预来缓解人工智能模型中的反事实偏见.
    • 提出一个新的框架,CIRCUS,以加强分类器中的反事实公平性.
    • 开发一种有效的因果干预和反事实生成方法.

    主要方法:

    • 提出了因果推断表式生成对抗网络 (CITGAN),用于因果干预和反事实生成,通过端到端拓过程强制执行因果一致性.
    • 集成的外源变量推断与CITGAN中的顺序生成,以保持结构功能依赖.
    • 开发了CIRCUS框架,该框架使用因果干预生成反事实歧视性样本 (CDS),并应用标签预处理来纠正偏差.

    主要成果:

    • 实际上,CIRCUS框架有效地提高了反事实公平性,同时保持了强大的分类性能.
    • 对于深度神经网络 (DNN) 模型,CIRCUS平均减少了MMD_L和MMD_K值,分别为39.7%和40.4%.

    更多相关视频

    A Psychophysics Paradigm for the Collection and Analysis of Similarity Judgments
    08:12

    A Psychophysics Paradigm for the Collection and Analysis of Similarity Judgments

    Published on: March 1, 2022

    2.1K
    An R-Based Landscape Validation of a Competing Risk Model
    05:37

    An R-Based Landscape Validation of a Competing Risk Model

    Published on: September 16, 2022

    2.3K

    相关实验视频

    Last Updated: May 5, 2026

    Pavlovian Conditioned Approach Training in Rats
    06:57

    Pavlovian Conditioned Approach Training in Rats

    Published on: February 4, 2016

    10.7K
    A Psychophysics Paradigm for the Collection and Analysis of Similarity Judgments
    08:12

    A Psychophysics Paradigm for the Collection and Analysis of Similarity Judgments

    Published on: March 1, 2022

    2.1K
    An R-Based Landscape Validation of a Competing Risk Model
    05:37

    An R-Based Landscape Validation of a Competing Risk Model

    Published on: September 16, 2022

    2.3K
  • 对于剩余网络 (ResNet) 模型,CIRCUS在MMD_L和MMD_K值中分别实现了56.7%和54.5%的降低.
  • 结论:

    • 拟议的CITGAN架构和CIRCUS框架为缓解人工智能的反事实偏见提供了一个强大的解决方案.
    • 因果干预是提高机器学习分类器中的反事实公平性的有效策略.
    • 结果显示,在不影响分类准确性的情况下,公平度指标得到了显著改善.