人们如何保持双方同意的非一夫一妻制? 一个国际发展和验证多重关系维护规模的国际发展和验证
Justin K Mogilski1, Geoffrey F Miller2, Peter K Jonason3
1Department of Psychology, University of South Carolina Salkehatchie, Walterboro, SC, 29483, USA. justin.mogilski@gmail.com.
Archives of sexual behavior
|March 17, 2026
概括
同意的非一夫一妻制 (CNM) 涉及管理多种关系. 研究人员确定了九个关键的CNM风险管理实践,如开放的沟通和性健康维护,以提高关系质量.
科学领域:
- 心理学 心理学 心理学
- 社会学 社会学 社会学
- 关系科学科学 关系科学
背景情况:
- 独家夫妻关系 (一夫一妻制) 是传统的,但存在风险.
- 一致非一夫一妻制 (CNM) 实践,如多夫一妻制,旨在减轻这些风险.
- 关于典型的CNM风险管理及其结果的研究有限.
研究的目的:
- 记录共识性非一夫一妻制 (CNM) 中典型的风险管理实践.
- 开发和验证多重关系维护量表 (MRMS) 以评估CNM实践.
- 检查CNM实践如何预测关系质量.
主要方法:
- 研究1:社区样本 (N=429) 确定了CNM的最佳实践.
- 研究2:开发了MRMS,并在国际在线调查中评估了其结构和有效性 (N=4,290).
- 在一个子集 (n=871) 中分析了MRMS实践与关系结果之间的关联.
主要成果:
- 因素分析揭示了九种CNM实践:披露,嫉妒沟通,交谈,照顾孩子的意愿,共享经验,合作伙伴等级,性健康,资源分配和声誉管理.
- 每种做法都与CNM经验,关系满意度,伴侣投资和不忠有着明显的关联.
- 该MRMS证明了构造有效性和因子结构.
结论:
- 实际上,MRMS有效地衡量了维持共识性非一夫一妻制 (CNM) 的九种关键做法.
- 这些做法与各种关系结果有关,包括满意度和相互依赖.
- 在CNM上下文中,MRMS可以成为研究关系维护的宝贵工具.
相关概念视频
Self-Evaluation Maintenance Model
383
The Self-Evaluation Maintenance (SEM) model offers a psychological framework to understand how individuals’ self-esteem is influenced by the achievements of others, particularly those with whom they share close personal bonds. The SEM model operates when personal rather than social identity guides individuals. Central to this model is the notion that individuals have an inherent desire to preserve a favorable self-image, which is continuously shaped by interpersonal comparisons and...
383
Relationship Growth
275
Interpersonal relationships progress through stages, beginning with awareness and moving toward mutuality, where emotional connections deepen. While many relationships remain at moderate levels of mutuality, deeper connections form through self-disclosure, trust, and interdependence.Self-DisclosureSelf-disclosure involves revealing personal information, starting with surface-level details and gradually progressing to more intimate content. As trust grows, individuals feel more comfortable...
275
Social Exchange Theory
40.9K
We have discussed why we form relationships, what attracts us to others, and different types of love. But what determines whether we are satisfied with and stay in a relationship? One theory that provides an explanation is social exchange theory. According to social exchange theory, we act as naïve economists in keeping a tally of the ratio of costs and benefits of forming and maintaining a relationship with others (Rusbult & Van Lange, 2003).
40.9K
Social Exchange Theory
684
As formulated by John Thibaut and Harold Kelley, Social Exchange Theory explains human relationships as economic-like exchanges that maximize rewards and minimize costs. This theory suggests that individuals engage in relationships to gain benefits and reduce burdens, similar to economic transactions. It has been widely applied to various types of relationships, including romantic, professional, and social interactions.Rewards and Costs in RelationshipsRelationship rewards include emotional...
684
Relationship Formation
46.3K
What do you think is the single most influential factor in determining with whom you become friends and whom you form romantic relationships? You might be surprised to learn that the answer is simple: the people with whom you have the most contact. This most important factor is proximity. You are more likely to be friends with people you have regular contact with. For example, there are decades of research that shows that you are more likely to become friends with people who live in your dorm,...
46.3K
Strategies of Self-Presentation III: Self-Monitoring
365
Self-monitoring is a central construct in understanding individual differences in self-presentation strategies across social contexts. It refers to how individuals observe, regulate, and control their expressive behavior and self-presentation following situational cues. Self-monitoring reflects a person's sensitivity to social appropriateness and willingness to adapt behavior to fit varying interpersonal demands.High vs. Low Self-Monitoring IndividualsIndividuals high in self-monitoring are...
365


