Related Experiment Videos

Iron deficiency anaemia: continuous versus intermittent treatment in anaemic children

A Hafeez1, P Ahmad

  • 1Department of Paediatrics, KRL Hospital, Islamabad.

Insights

Intermittent oral iron therapy is as effective as daily treatment for children aged 1 to 6 with iron deficiency anaemia. This finding offers a potentially more convenient treatment option for pediatric patients.

Area of Science:

  • Pediatric Hematology
  • Nutritional Anemias

Background:

  • Iron deficiency anaemia (IDA) is a prevalent condition in children.
  • Current standard treatment involves daily oral iron supplementation.
  • Alternative dosing regimens warrant investigation for improved adherence and efficacy.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To compare the efficacy of intermittent (3 days/week) versus continuous (daily) oral iron therapy in treating IDA in children.
  • To evaluate hemoglobin level changes in pediatric patients receiving different oral iron dosing schedules.

Main Methods:

  • A randomized controlled trial was conducted with children aged 1 to 6 years diagnosed with IDA (Hb < 11 g/dl).
  • Participants were divided into two groups: Group A received daily elemental iron (6 mg/kg), and Group B received the same dose thrice weekly.
  • Hemoglobin levels were measured before treatment and after 2 months.

Main Results:

  • Both groups showed significant increases in hemoglobin levels after 2 months of treatment.
  • Group A's mean Hb increased from 8.56 g/dl to 11.06 g/dl.
  • Group B's mean Hb increased from 8.32 g/dl to 11.3 g/dl.
  • The difference in hemoglobin rise between the two groups was not statistically significant.

Conclusions:

  • Intermittent oral iron therapy is as effective as continuous daily therapy for treating iron deficiency anaemia in children aged 1 to 6 years.
  • The findings suggest that a less frequent dosing schedule may be a viable and equally effective alternative for pediatric IDA treatment.

Related Concept Videos