Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Evaluation of driving-while-intoxicated programs; some methodological considerations.

B Hayslip, D Kapusinski, A Darbes

    Journal of Studies on Alcohol
    |November 11, 1976
    PubMed
    Summary
    This summary is machine-generated.

    Related Concept Videos

    You might also read

    Related Articles

    Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

    Sort by
    Same author

    [Regional distribution of the cochlear implant (CI) centers in Germany].

    Laryngo- rhino- otologie·2020
    Same author

    Guideline "Implantable hearing aids"-short version : German S2k guideline of the Working Group of German-Speaking Audiologists, Neurootologists and Otologists (ADANO), of the German Society of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology, Head and Neck Surgery (DGHNO) in collaboration with the German Society of Audiology (DGA), the German Society of Phoniatrics and Pediatric Audiology (DGPP), and patient representatives.

    HNO·2018
    Same author

    [Guideline "Implantable hearing aids"-short version : German S2k guideline of the Working Group of German-speaking Audiologists, Neurootologists and Otologists (ADANO), of the German Society of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology, Head and Neck Surgery (DGHNO) in collaboration with the German Society of Audiology (DGA), the German Society of Phoniatrics and Pediatric Audiology (DGPP), and patient representatives].

    HNO·2018
    Same author

    [Inpatient rehabilitation of adult CI users: Results in dependency of duration of deafness, CI experience and age].

    HNO·2015
    Same author

    The German Mouse Clinic: a platform for systemic phenotype analysis of mouse models.

    Current pharmaceutical biotechnology·2009
    Same author

    The development of the physicians' end-of-life care attitude scale.

    Omega·2003
    Same journal

    One small step for manuals: Computer-assisted training in twelve-step facilitation.

    Journal of studies on alcohol·2006
    Same journal

    The impact of alcohol taxation on liver cirrhosis mortality.

    Journal of studies on alcohol·2006
    Same journal

    Activating action tendencies: The influence of action priming on alcohol consumption among male hazardous drinkers.

    Journal of studies on alcohol·2006
    Same journal

    A multidimensional developmental model of alcohol use during emerging adulthood.

    Journal of studies on alcohol·2006
    Same journal

    Spring break trips as a risk factor for heavy alcohol use among first-year college students.

    Journal of studies on alcohol·2006
    Same journal

    Alcohol, illegal drugs, violent crime, and traffic-related and other unintended injuries in U.S. local and national news.

    Journal of studies on alcohol·2006
    See all related articles

    Evaluating driving-while-intoxicated programs presents methodological challenges. This study addresses key issues in assessing program effectiveness for impaired driving interventions.

    Area of Science:

    • Public Health
    • Criminology
    • Traffic Safety

    Background:

    • Driving while intoxicated (DWI) programs aim to reduce impaired driving incidents.
    • Effective evaluation of these programs is crucial for public safety and resource allocation.
    • Existing methodologies may not fully capture program impact or address confounding factors.

    Purpose of the Study:

    • To identify and discuss significant methodological problems in evaluating DWI programs.
    • To highlight challenges in accurately measuring the effectiveness of interventions designed to prevent drunk driving.
    • To inform future research and program development in the field of impaired driving prevention.

    Main Methods:

    • Literature review of existing DWI program evaluation studies.

    Related Experiment Videos

  • Analysis of common methodological pitfalls in quantitative and qualitative research.
  • Discussion of statistical and design challenges in assessing behavioral change and recidivism.

    • Main Results:

    • Inconsistent outcome measures and definitions of program success.
    • Difficulties in controlling for confounding variables such as socioeconomic factors and co-occurring substance abuse.
    • Challenges in long-term follow-up and attribution of behavioral changes solely to the DWI program.

    Conclusions:

    • Robust methodological frameworks are needed for reliable DWI program evaluation.
    • Standardized metrics and rigorous study designs are essential to accurately assess intervention effectiveness.
    • Addressing identified methodological issues will improve the evidence base for DWI prevention strategies.