Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Musing while cutting.

G M Guiraudon1

  • 1The CGF-Millard Fillmore Division, Department of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, Buffalo, New York 14209, USA. GGUIRAUD@mfhs.edu

Journal of Cardiac Surgery
|March 4, 1999
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

[The role of antiarrhythmic surgery in 2004].

Archives des maladies du coeur et des vaisseaux·2004
Same author

The HeartSaver left ventricular assist device: an update.

The Annals of thoracic surgery·2001
Same author

Pacing in right ventricular dysplasia after disconnection surgery.

Journal of cardiovascular electrophysiology·2000
Same author

ESCWGA/NASPE/P experts consensus statement: living anatomy of the atrioventricular junctions. A guide to electrophysiologic mapping. Working Group of Arrhythmias of the European Society of Cardiology. North American Society of Pacing and Electrophysiology.

Journal of cardiovascular electrophysiology·1999
Same author

Living anatomy of the atrioventricular junctions. A guide to electrophysiologic mapping. A Consensus Statement from the Cardiac Nomenclature Study Group, Working Group of Arrhythmias, European Society of Cardiology, and the Task Force on Cardiac Nomenclature from NASPE.

Circulation·1999
Same author

Living anatomy of the atrioventricular junctions. A guide to electrophysiological mapping. A Consensus Statement from the Cardiac Nomenclature Study Group, Working Group of Arrythmias, European Society of Cardiology, and the Task Force on Cardiac Nomenclature from NASPE. North American Society of Pacing and Electrophysiology.

European heart journal·1999
Same journal

Erratum.

Journal of cardiac surgery·2023
Same journal

Validity of direct bilateral axillary arterial cannulation in emergency surgery for acute type A aortic dissection.

Journal of cardiac surgery·2023
Same journal

Evaluation of midterm outcomes after Shone's complex surgery: Analysis of reoperation and mortality risk factors.

Journal of cardiac surgery·2023
Same journal

Subannular procedures on papillary muscles for secondary mitral valve regurgitation repair.

Journal of cardiac surgery·2022
Same journal

Safety of apixaban and rivaroxaban compared to warfarin after cardiac surgery.

Journal of cardiac surgery·2022
Same journal

Impact of rapid rehabilitation surgery on perioperative nursing in patients undergoing cardiac surgery: A meta-analysis.

Journal of cardiac surgery·2022
See all related articles

Cardiac surgeons face challenges as catheter interventions shift to cardiologists. Future success requires embracing less invasive surgery and a broader understanding of cardiology science.

Area of Science:

  • Cardiovascular Medicine
  • Surgical Innovation

Background:

  • Historically, cardiac surgeons held exclusive rights to cardiac interventions.
  • The rise of catheter-based procedures has led to cardiologists becoming interventionists, impacting surgical domains.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To analyze the evolving landscape of cardiac interventions and its impact on cardiac surgery.
  • To re-evaluate core concepts like surgery, intervention, and therapy in light of new technologies.
  • To propose a revised philosophy for the surgical profession.

Main Methods:

  • Conceptual analysis of historical and current practices in cardiac interventions.
  • Review of therapeutic planning, focusing on "target, bullet, and gun" delivery systems.
  • Examination of surgical morbidity and the concept of "side effects" in procedures.

Related Experiment Videos

Main Results:

  • Cardiac surgery is viewed as a delivery method with potential for significant "side effects" (morbidity).
  • The development of catheter surgery has encroached upon traditional surgical territories.
  • Cardiac surgery has historically neglected broader cardiology science, missing research and innovation opportunities.

Conclusions:

  • Future cardiac surgery must prioritize target-specific therapy and minimize collateral damage, embracing "less invasive surgery."
  • Surgeons need to become "Renaissance men" involved in all aspects of cardiology, not just the delivery.
  • The "delivering end" of procedures no longer justifies the means; a broader scientific engagement is essential.