Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Bladder augmentation. Options, outcomes, future.

R C Rink1

  • 1Department of Pediatric Urology, James Whitcomb Riley Hospital for Children, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, USA.

The Urologic Clinics of North America
|March 23, 1999
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Incidence of pathologic postobstructive diuresis after resolution of ureteropelvic junction obstruction with a normal contralateral kidney.

Journal of pediatric urology·2018
Same author

What about my daughter's future? Parental concerns when considering female genital restoration surgery in girls with congenital adrenal hyperplasia.

Journal of pediatric urology·2018
Same author

Do anterior catheterizable urinary channels have fewer complications than posterior channels? An international cohort study.

Journal of pediatric urology·2017
Same author

A case of base rate bias, or are adolescents at a higher risk of developing complications after catheterizable urinary channel surgery?

Journal of pediatric urology·2017
Same author

Long-term follow-up of composite bladder augmentation incorporating stomach in a multi-institutional cohort of patients with cloacal exstrophy.

Journal of pediatric urology·2016
Same author

Long-term outcomes of the Kropp and Salle urethral lengthening bladder neck reconstruction procedures.

Journal of pediatric urology·2016
Same journal

An Unprecedented Era of Innovation in Non-Muscle-Invasive Bladder Cancer.

The Urologic clinics of North America·2026
Same journal

Hubert Humphrey's Bladder Cancer: If He Could Have Time Traveled, Would that Have Changed the Outcome?

The Urologic clinics of North America·2026
Same journal

Key Clinical Trials Shaping the Future of Superficial High-Risk Bladder Cancer Management.

The Urologic clinics of North America·2026
Same journal

Future Directions: Artificial Intelligence and Digital Tools in Bladder Cancer Care.

The Urologic clinics of North America·2026
Same journal

Economic Considerations in the Management of Superficial Bladder Cancer.

The Urologic clinics of North America·2026
Same journal

Patient-Centered Approaches to Non-Muscle-Invasive Bladder Cancer Care.

The Urologic clinics of North America·2026
See all related articles

Augmentation cystoplasty offers several surgical options for pediatric lower urinary tract reconstruction. This review details current techniques, their benefits, limitations, and emerging tissue regeneration methods.

Area of Science:

  • Pediatric Urology
  • Surgical Reconstruction
  • Tissue Engineering

Background:

  • Significant advancements in pediatric lower urinary tract reconstruction.
  • Augmentation cystoplasty is a key procedure with multiple surgical approaches.
  • Understanding technique variations is crucial for optimal patient outcomes.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To review current techniques in pediatric augmentation cystoplasty.
  • To discuss the benefits and limitations of existing procedures.
  • To explore novel tissue regeneration strategies.

Main Methods:

  • Comprehensive literature review of augmentation cystoplasty techniques.
  • Analysis of benefits and drawbacks of various surgical options.
  • Inclusion of data on tissue regeneration advancements.

Related Experiment Videos

Main Results:

  • Several established techniques for augmentation cystoplasty exist.
  • Each technique presents unique advantages and disadvantages.
  • Tissue regeneration offers promising future alternatives.

Conclusions:

  • Augmentation cystoplasty remains a vital reconstructive option for children.
  • Careful consideration of technique-specific outcomes is essential.
  • Tissue regeneration holds potential for future reconstructive surgery.