Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

How smart should pacemakers Be?

N Saoudi1, U Appl, F Anselme

  • 1Department of Cardiology, CHRU Charles Nicolle, Rouen, France.

The American Journal of Cardiology
|March 25, 1999
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

New prognostic and predictive scoring systems for colorectal cancer liver metastases.

ESMO open·2026
Same author

Retreatment with oxaliplatin-based regimens in refractory metastatic colorectal cancer: characterization of high-response patients.

ESMO gastrointestinal oncology·2026
Same author

[Accessibility to TAVI in a center without cardiac surgery : a Corsican example].

Annales de cardiologie et d'angeiologie·2025
Same author

Corrigendum to "Plasmatic BRAF-V600E allele fraction as a prognostic factor in metastatic colorectal cancer treated with BRAF combinatorial treatments": [Annals of Oncology 34 (2023) 543-552].

Annals of oncology : official journal of the European Society for Medical Oncology·2024
Same author

Sex and gender perspectives in colorectal cancer.

ESMO open·2023
Same author

Plasmatic BRAF-V600E allele fraction as a prognostic factor in metastatic colorectal cancer treated with BRAF combinatorial treatments.

Annals of oncology : official journal of the European Society for Medical Oncology·2023
Same journal

Real-World Effectiveness and Tolerability of Sacubitril/Valsartan in Octogenarian Patients With Heart Failure: Results From the PARACHUTER Study.

The American journal of cardiology·2026
Same journal

ECG-Guided Conduction Pathways as a Lever to Shorten Post-TAVI Hospitalization.

The American journal of cardiology·2026
Same journal

Cystatin-C versus creatinine and kidney function in heart failure with preserved ejection fraction: a SOGALDI-PEF analysis.

The American journal of cardiology·2026
Same journal

Balloon-expandable versus Self-expanding Valves in Patients with Small Aortic Annuli Undergoing Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement.

The American journal of cardiology·2026
Same journal

Drug-Coated Balloons versus Drug-Eluting Stents following Coronary Atherectomy in Severely Calcified Lesions: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

The American journal of cardiology·2026
Same journal

Prehospital Statin Therapy and Outcomes in ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction Undergoing Primary Percutaneous Coronary Intervention.

The American journal of cardiology·2026
See all related articles

Smart pacemakers have evolved significantly, offering improved treatment, diagnosis, and quality of life. Future devices aim for greater flexibility, automatic functions, and enhanced diagnostics for optimal patient care.

Area of Science:

  • Biomedical Engineering
  • Cardiology
  • Medical Device Technology

Background:

  • Pacemakers have advanced over 40 years, evolving from life-saving devices for bradycardia to quality-of-life enhancers.
  • Technological progress, including microprocessors and miniaturization, has led to smaller, longer-lasting pacemakers.
  • Current pacemakers offer numerous functions under specific conditions, improving patient outcomes.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To define the current concept of "smart" pacemakers, encompassing optimal treatment, diagnosis, and follow-up.
  • To identify unmet objectives in pacemaker technology, such as optimizing cardiac output and managing atrial arrhythmias.
  • To explore future directions for smart pacemakers, focusing on enhanced flexibility, automatic functions, and comprehensive diagnostics.

Main Methods:

Related Experiment Videos

  • Review of technological advancements in pacemaker development over the past 40 years.
  • Analysis of current pacemaker functionalities, indications, and limitations.
  • Discussion of future requirements for smart pacemakers based on evolving clinical needs and technological potential.

Main Results:

  • Smart pacemakers now represent the state-of-the-art in patient care, integrating advanced features.
  • Despite progress, challenges remain in optimizing cardiac output and managing atrial arrhythmias.
  • Future smart pacemakers require increased flexibility for programming and user-friendly diagnostic capabilities.

Conclusions:

  • The definition of a smart pacemaker is dynamic, constantly redefined by technological progress and clinical needs.
  • Automation of functions and documentation is crucial for efficient management of complex pacemaker systems.
  • Future smart pacemakers must balance sophisticated capabilities with ease of use for both patients and healthcare providers.