Interpretative difficulties with growth hormone provocative retesting in childhood-onset growth hormone deficiency

A review of literature demonstrates that there are many ill-understood factors that determine the results of GH provocative (re)testing, so that these results should be interpreted with extreme caution when used for diagnosis or confirmation of diagnosis of GHD. GH provocation tests are probably of no value at all for what has been called 'partial GHD'. The phenomenon of 'normalization' of test results after long-term treatment with GH needs no 'transient GHD' hypothesis as it can be largely explained by the very low reproducibility of the tests and by a regression to the mean effect. Moreover, it is possible that 'normal values' increase with age. Other determinants of normal peak values may also change from childhood to adulthood and contribute to 'normalization'.