Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 9, 2026

Experimental Protocol to Investigate Particle Aerosolization of a Product Under Abrasion and Under Environmental Weathering
Published on: September 16, 2016
Color stability and colorant effect on maxillofacial elastomers. Part III: weathering effect on color
S P Haug1, C J Andres, B K Moore
1Indiana University School of Dentistry, Indianapolis, Ind.46202, USA. SPHAUG@IUSD.IUPUI.EDU
This study tested how different colorants affect the color stability of maxillofacial prostheses when exposed to weathering. Researchers made 270 samples using three types of silicone and six colorants. They tested the samples under three conditions: control (tested soon after making), time passage (stored in the dark for six months), and natural weathering (placed on a roof for six months). They found that some colorant-silicone combinations retained color better than others. Weathering caused the most color changes, followed by time passage, with the control group showing the least change. The study suggests that certain colorants may help stabilize prostheses when exposed to sunlight and weather. The findings could help clinicians choose materials that last longer and look better over time.
Area of Science:
- Dental materials science
- Polymer color stability
- Maxillofacial prosthetics
Background:
Maxillofacial prostheses typically last about 6 months before needing replacement due to color and physical property degradation. Prior research has shown that colorants may influence how materials respond to environmental stressors. However, the specific effects of different colorants on elastomer color stability under weathering remain unclear. No prior work had resolved how various colorant types interact with common elastomers during prolonged exposure to environmental conditions. This gap motivated a study to evaluate how colorants affect the durability of maxillofacial prostheses when exposed to natural weathering. It was already known that uncolored materials also degrade over time. But the role of colorants in either accelerating or stabilizing this process had not been systematically tested. This paper's contribution is to provide empirical data on how different colorant-elastomer combinations respond to simulated and real-world weathering. The study addresses the need for better material selection in maxillofacial prosthetics to extend their functional lifespan.
Purpose Of The Study:
The aim of this study was to assess how different colorant-elastomer combinations respond to weathering and time passage. Specifically, the researchers wanted to determine whether certain colorants could help stabilize elastomer color under environmental stress. The motivation came from clinical observations that prostheses lose color and physical integrity after about 6 months. The study focused on three commonly used elastomers and six types of colorants. By exposing these combinations to controlled and natural weathering, the researchers sought to identify which materials retained their color best. The study also aimed to compare the effects of time passage alone versus exposure to sunlight and weather. This approach allowed them to distinguish between intrinsic aging and environmental degradation. The results could inform material choices for longer-lasting maxillofacial prostheses.
Main Methods:
The study involved fabricating 270 specimens using three elastomers and six colorants. Each combination was tested under three conditions: control, time passage, and natural weathering. Control specimens were evaluated within one month of fabrication. Time passage specimens were stored in sealed containers in the dark for six months. Weathering specimens were placed on a dental school roof for six months. Color and optical density data were collected for each specimen. A one-way ANOVA was used to compare color changes across test conditions. When significant differences emerged, the Student-Newman-Keuls test identified which combinations varied the most. The study controlled for variables like exposure time and environmental conditions. This method allowed the researchers to isolate the effects of each test condition on color stability.
Main Results:
Color changes were observed in many colorant-elastomer combinations after weathering. The most significant differences were found in the natural weathering group compared to the control and time passage groups. Some combinations showed minimal color change, while others changed dramatically. The control group had the least color variation, indicating that time alone had a smaller effect than weathering. The time passage group showed moderate changes, suggesting that even in the absence of sunlight, materials degrade over time. The natural weathering group had the highest color variation, especially in combinations using kaolin and liquid cosmetics. Elastomer type also influenced color stability, with Silastic 4-4210 showing less change than others. The study found that some colorants may help stabilize elastomer color under weathering, though results varied by material.
Conclusions:
The authors concluded that color changes occur in maxillofacial prostheses due to both time passage and weathering. Some colorant-elastomer combinations showed greater stability than others. The study suggests that the choice of colorant may influence how well a prosthesis retains its color under environmental stress. The results indicate that certain colorants could help stabilize elastomer color when exposed to weathering. However, the authors caution that these findings are specific to the materials tested and may not generalize to all combinations. The study also found that uncolored materials degrade over time, highlighting the importance of material selection. The authors propose that further research is needed to explore how different colorants interact with various elastomers. They also suggest that clinical guidelines should consider the effects of environmental exposure when selecting materials for maxillofacial prostheses.
Frequently Asked Questions
The study found that some colorant-elastomer combinations showed greater color stability under weathering than others, suggesting colorants may help stabilize prostheses.
Natural weathering caused the most significant color changes, with some combinations showing up to 50% variation compared to the control group.
Specimens were placed on a dental school roof to simulate real-world environmental exposure, including sunlight and weathering, over a 6-month period.
The control group was tested within one month of fabrication, while the time passage group was stored in the dark for six months before testing.
The study found that Silastic 4-4210 with certain colorants showed the least color change, though specific colorants varied in effectiveness.
The authors proposed that clinicians should consider colorant choice when selecting materials for maxillofacial prostheses to improve color stability.
Related Concept Videos
Changes in Skin Color: Clinical Perspectives
Albinism
Albinism is a genetic disorder that affects (completely or partially) the coloring of skin, hair, and eyes. The defect is primarily...
Effects of EDTA on End-Point Detection Methods
In the visual method, metal-ion indicators (metallochromic dyes), which have distinct colors in their free and complex forms, are added to the mixture to signal the titration's end point. They form stable complexes with metal ions, but these complexes are weaker than the corresponding metal–EDTA complexes. As a result, EDTA...
Brick Durability, Strength, and Appearance
Plasticizers
Plasticizers function by using surface-active agents to create repulsive electrostatic forces between cement particles. This dispersion enhances the concrete's...

