Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 2, 2026

A Novel Method for Involving Women of Color at High Risk for Preterm Birth in Research Priority Setting
Published on: January 12, 2018
Physicians' perceptions of risk adjustment and health policy formation in Minnesota
J V Oberstar1, J G Boulger, B J Crouse
1University of Minnesota-Duluth School of Medicine, USA.
Abstract:
A questionnaire was used to assess Minnesota physicians' knowledge of and opinions about risk adjustment, a policy designed to modify payments to health providers based on the relative "sickness" level of the provider's patient population. Additionally, attitudes toward this policy were measured to examine physicians' perceptions of health policy formation in Minnesota. Although familiarity with this policy appears low, respondents support the concept of diagnosis-based risk adjustment. Physicians are divided on whether to further modify risk-adjusted rates with a conversion factor; their written comments suggest a mistrust of the policymaking process. Physicians most often listed the Minnesota Medical Association as a primary source for health policy information, while few respondents reported any communication with state legislators in health policy matters. Respondents perceive an imbalance in the influence wielded by various entities in health policy formation. Only 5% believe individual physicians have significant influence in policymaking. Increased communication between physicians and their legislators may be one way for physicians to gain such influence.
Insights
Minnesota physicians support diagnosis-based risk adjustment but show low familiarity. They perceive mistrust in policymaking and an imbalance of influence, suggesting increased legislator communication could empower physicians.
Area of Science:
- Health Policy
- Medical Economics
- Physician Attitudes
Background:
- Risk adjustment is a policy modifying healthcare payments based on patient population "sickness" levels.
- Understanding physician perspectives on risk adjustment and health policy formation in Minnesota is crucial.
Purpose of the Study:
- To assess Minnesota physicians' knowledge and opinions regarding risk adjustment policies.
- To examine physicians' attitudes toward health policy formation and their perceived influence.
Main Methods:
- A questionnaire survey was administered to Minnesota physicians.
- Data collected included knowledge, opinions, and attitudes toward risk adjustment and policy formation.
Main Results:
- Physician familiarity with risk adjustment was low, yet support for diagnosis-based risk adjustment was evident.
- Physicians were divided on modifying risk-adjusted rates and expressed mistrust in the policymaking process.
- The Minnesota Medical Association was a primary information source; legislator communication was minimal, with physicians perceiving an influence imbalance.
Conclusions:
- Physicians support the concept of risk adjustment but are wary of its implementation and the policy process.
- Physicians feel they lack significant influence in health policy, with only 5% believing they have substantial input.
- Enhanced communication between physicians and legislators is recommended to increase physician influence in health policy matters.
More Related Videos
06:55Inverse Probability of Treatment Weighting (Propensity Score) using the Military Health System Data Repository and National Death Index
Published on: January 8, 2020
07:31Implementation of a Real-Time Psychosis Risk Detection and Alerting System Based on Electronic Health Records using CogStack
Published on: May 15, 2020
Related Concept Videos
Introduction To Health Care Delivery System
The Institute of Medicine (IOM) advocates for a patient-centered, effective, safe, timely, equitable, and effective healthcare system. The National Priorities...
Issues And Trends In Healthcare Delivery System
Cost Containment
Payment for healthcare services has historically promoted adoption of costly and often unnecessary or inefficient...
Errors occurring during blood pressure monitoring
Several factors...
Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches
Non-controlled studies, commonly employed for initial exploration, lack a control group, rendering them susceptible to biases and external influences. In contrast, controlled...
Impact of Pharmacokinetic–Pharmacodynamic Models: Regulatory Decisions
Psychosurgery
Historical Development of Psychosurgery
In the 1930s, Portuguese neurologist Antonio Egas Moniz introduced a surgical procedure designed...