Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Evaluation of soft-tissue tumors.

D Springfield1

  • 1Department of Orthopaedics, Mount Sinai Medical Center, New York, USA.

Instructional Course Lectures
|March 31, 1999
PubMed
Summary

Differentiating benign soft-tissue masses from potentially malignant sarcomas is crucial for physicians. Careful evaluation and imaging like MRI can guide decisions on biopsy or monitoring for these concerning growths.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Evaluation of a carbon dioxide laser scalpel for disbudding Holstein calves: A pilot study.

JDS communications·2022
Same author

Intra-articular fibroma of tendon sheath of the shoulder joint: synovial fibroma.

Skeletal radiology·2005
Same author

Osteoblastoma like osteosarcoma.

Clinical radiology·2003
Same author

Intracortical osteosarcoma; two-year delay in diagnosis.

Skeletal radiology·2002
Same author

Unifocal epithelioid hemangioendothelioma of the tibia: case report.

Canadian Association of Radiologists journal = Journal l'Association canadienne des radiologistes·2000
Same author

Fine-needle aspiration diagnosis of synovial chondromatosis of the tibiofibular joint.

Annals of diagnostic pathology·2000

Area of Science:

  • Oncology
  • Radiology
  • Pathology

Background:

  • Soft-tissue masses are common clinical findings.
  • Distinguishing benign lesions from malignant sarcomas is critical due to significant morbidity and mortality associated with missed diagnoses.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To outline a diagnostic approach for evaluating soft-tissue masses.
  • To differentiate between masses requiring immediate intervention and those amenable to observation.

Main Methods:

  • Clinical assessment of soft-tissue masses.
  • Recommendations for imaging modalities, primarily Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI).
  • Guidelines for biopsy decisions based on clinical and imaging findings.

Main Results:

  • Most soft-tissue masses are benign and require no immediate intervention.
  • A subset of masses warrants further investigation due to potential malignancy.
  • MRI is a key imaging tool for characterizing soft-tissue masses.

Conclusions:

  • A systematic approach to soft-tissue masses is essential for optimal patient care.
  • Timely MRI and biopsy are recommended for worrisome masses to rule out sarcoma.
  • Periodic re-evaluation is appropriate for masses not initially requiring biopsy.

Related Experiment Videos