Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Fire risk analysis: general conceptual framework for describing models.

J R Hall1, A Sekizawa

  • 1National Fire Protection Association, Quincy, MA.

Fire Technology
|January 9, 1991
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Aspirin delays preterm birth in pregnancies at high risk for preterm pre-eclampsia: evidence from randomized clinical trial in Asia.

Ultrasound in obstetrics & gynecology : the official journal of the International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology·2025
Same author

Effects of implant status and breed type on feedlot performance, carcass characteristics, sera metabolites, and immunohistochemical responses in finishing steers.

Journal of animal science·2025
Same author

Characteristics of coexisting attractors and ghost orbiting in an optomechanical microresonator.

Chaos (Woodbury, N.Y.)·2024
Same author

Predicting attractor characteristics using Lyapunov exponents in a laser with injected signal.

Chaos (Woodbury, N.Y.)·2021
Same author

Predictive immunohistochemical features for tumour response to chemoradiotherapy in rectal cancer.

BJS open·2020
Same author

How should maternal death due to suicide be classified? Discrepancy between ICD-10 and ICD-MM.

BJOG : an international journal of obstetrics and gynaecology·2020
Same journal

A Systematic Review of Building Fire Safety Practices in the UK: Approaches, Challenges and Recommendations.

Fire technology·2025
Same journal

An Approach for Flux and Thickness Scaling of Cone Calorimeter Data for Predicting the Pyrolysis of Materials.

Fire technology·2025
Same journal

Qualitative Analysis of Ventilation Position and Dimension Effects on Compartment Fire Dynamics: An Experimental and Numerical Approach.

Fire technology·2025
Same journal

Structural Fire Experimental Capabilities in NIST National Fire Research Laboratory.

Fire technology·2025
Same journal

Numerical Study on the Effect of Atmospheric Wind on the Fire Severity in Informal Settlements with Different Dwellings' Wall Thermal Characteristics.

Fire technology·2025
Same journal

Investigating Numerically the Effect of Wind on Fire Spread Between Two Informal Settlements Dwellings.

Fire technology·2025
See all related articles

A new framework aids fire risk analysis by comparing different approaches. It defines key elements like scenarios and probability functions, illustrating its utility with examples.

Area of Science:

  • Fire Safety Engineering
  • Risk Assessment Methodologies
  • Quantitative Analysis

Background:

  • Existing fire risk analysis methods lack a unified comparison framework.
  • Diverse approaches to fire risk assessment present challenges in evaluation.
  • Standardization is needed for discussing and comparing fire risk analysis strategies.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To introduce a general conceptual framework for discussing alternative fire risk analysis approaches.
  • To provide a structured method for comparing different fire risk assessment strategies.
  • To clarify common concerns addressed by various fire risk analysis methods.

Main Methods:

  • Development of a conceptual framework defining key elements.
  • Identification and discussion of scenario structures, probability functions, and outcome measures.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Categorization and explanation of different modeling approaches.
  • Application of the framework to diverse case studies for comparative analysis.

    • Main Results:

    • The framework successfully illustrates how different fire risk analysis alternatives address common concerns.
    • Defined concepts and elements facilitate a clearer understanding of various approaches.
    • Comparative analysis using the framework highlights the strengths and weaknesses of diverse methods.
    • Demonstrated utility of the framework in making informed comparisons between fire risk analysis techniques.

    Conclusions:

    • The developed conceptual framework is a valuable tool for evaluating and comparing fire risk analysis methodologies.
    • It enhances discussions on fire safety by providing a common structure and language.
    • The framework supports informed decision-making in selecting appropriate fire risk assessment strategies.