Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Universal basic benefits preempt mandated benefits.

R Priester1

  • 1Center for Biomedical Ethics, University of Minnesota.

Benefits Quarterly
|December 10, 1991
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Is the experimental treatment exclusion used appropriately?

Minnesota medicine·2000
Same author

A model for improving coverage policy decisions.

The American journal of managed care·1999
Same author

The human B cell response to IL-13 is dependent on cellular phenotype as well as mode of activation.

Journal of immunology (Baltimore, Md. : 1950)·1999
Same author

Investigational treatments: process, payment, and priorities.

JAMA·1997
Same author

Value-based formulas for purchasing. Does managed care offer value to society?

Managed care quarterly·1997
Same author

Mandates for unproven health care interventions.

Minnesota medicine·1996
Same journal

How ACA Is Forcing a Technology Revolution.

Benefits quarterly·2018
Same journal

How Employers Are Looking at Specialty Pharmacy Today.

Benefits quarterly·2018
Same journal

Pharmacy Benefit Integration: A Connected Approach to Total Medical Cost Savings.

Benefits quarterly·2018
Same journal

Attention Turns to Specialty Pharmacy.

Benefits quarterly·2018
Same journal

Managing Pharmacy Trend Rates.

Benefits quarterly·2018
Same journal

Challenges Facing U.S. Long-Term Care Financing: Future Needs, Key Issues and Current Solutions.

Benefits quarterly·2018
See all related articles

States aim to expand health care access for the uninsured by defining a basic benefits package. This defined level of services should serve as a minimum floor for all residents, potentially replacing existing state-mandated benefits.

Area of Science:

  • Health Policy
  • Public Health
  • Healthcare Economics

Background:

  • Numerous states are exploring strategies to broaden healthcare access for uninsured populations.
  • Defining a standardized basic health services package is a critical component of these expansion efforts.
  • Current state-mandated benefits for private insurers vary significantly, creating an uneven landscape.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To examine the implications of defining a basic level of health services for all state residents.
  • To propose that this defined basic level should act as a universal minimum standard.
  • To discuss the potential replacement of existing, varied state-mandated benefits with this new floor.

Main Methods:

  • Policy analysis of state healthcare mandates.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Comparative review of existing health insurance benefit designs.
  • Ethical and economic considerations of defining a basic benefits package.

    • Main Results:

    • States must establish a defined set of essential health services for universal access.
    • This basic level is likely to be less comprehensive than many current private insurance plans.
    • A standardized floor could streamline benefits and ensure equitable access.

    Conclusions:

    • Defining a basic health services package is essential for expanding healthcare access to the uninsured.
    • This defined level should function as a minimum standard for all residents.
    • Implementing a universal floor could simplify and equalize healthcare benefits across a state.