Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Hospital ethics committees: problems in evaluation.

G G Griener1, J L Storch

  • 1University of Calgary, Coroda.

HEC Forum : an Interdisciplinary Journal on Hospitals' Ethical and Legal Issues
|December 10, 1991
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Listening to nurses' moral voices: building a quality health care environment.

Canadian journal of nursing leadership·2003
Same author

Is practical nursing experience necessary in administration, education, and research?

Western journal of nursing research·2001
Same author

The Calgary Conjoint Nursing Program. Part II: Successful political action.

The Canadian nurse·1999
Same author

The Calgary Conjoint Nursing Program. Part I: Spirit of collaboration.

The Canadian nurse·1999
Same author

Casualization of nurses and unregulated workers impair ethical practice.

International nursing review·1998
Same author

The physician's authority to withhold futile treatment.

The Journal of medicine and philosophy·1995
Same journal

A Commentary on Ethics Case Reflections as an Ethics laboratory in Clinical Practice.

HEC forum : an interdisciplinary journal on hospitals' ethical and legal issues·2026
Same journal

From Cyberchondria to Spatial Anxiety: How Much Should I Worry About My Well-Being?

HEC forum : an interdisciplinary journal on hospitals' ethical and legal issues·2026
Same journal

Moral Considerations of Patient Participation in Moral Case Deliberation: An Explorative Interview Study Among Healthcare Professionals, (Parents of) Patients and Facilitators.

HEC forum : an interdisciplinary journal on hospitals' ethical and legal issues·2026
Same journal

On the Formation of Professional Identity in Clinical Ethics Consultation: Future or Illusion?

HEC forum : an interdisciplinary journal on hospitals' ethical and legal issues·2026
Same journal

Community Input on NRP: Establishing Ethical Guidelines for Normothermic Regional Perfusion Through Community and Professional Engagement.

HEC forum : an interdisciplinary journal on hospitals' ethical and legal issues·2026
Same journal

A Survey of Ethics Review Committees in New York State Hospitals: Key Findings and Lessons.

HEC forum : an interdisciplinary journal on hospitals' ethical and legal issues·2026
See all related articles

Hospital ethics committees are widespread but lack rigorous impact evaluations. This study explores why, identifying unresolved disputes over the goals of case review as a primary barrier to assessing their effectiveness in healthcare practice.

Area of Science:

  • Medical Ethics
  • Healthcare Management
  • Health Policy Analysis

Background:

  • Hospital ethics committees (HECs) have become increasingly common in healthcare institutions.
  • Despite their proliferation, there is a lack of rigorous evaluation regarding their practical impact.
  • Previous recommendations for evaluation have not been widely implemented.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate the reasons behind the lack of rigorous evaluation of hospital ethics committees' impact.
  • To identify barriers hindering the assessment of HEC effectiveness in clinical practice.
  • To explore the specific challenges in evaluating the case review function of HECs.

Main Methods:

  • The study analyzes the multifaceted roles of HECs, including education, policy formulation, and case review.
Keywords:
Professional Patient Relationship

Related Experiment Videos

  • It focuses on identifying the principal obstacles to evaluating the novel case review function.
  • The research examines the underlying disputes that impede objective assessment.

    • Main Results:

    • Multiple roles of HECs (education, policy, case review) require distinct evaluation approaches.
    • A significant barrier to evaluating HEC impact is the lack of consensus on the goals of case review.
    • Unresolved disputes over the objectives of case review prevent rigorous impact assessment.

    Conclusions:

    • The widespread adoption of HECs has not been matched by evidence of their effectiveness.
    • Addressing the fundamental disagreements regarding the purpose of case review is crucial for future evaluations.
    • Further research is needed to establish clear objectives for HEC case review to enable impact assessment.