Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Body support testing and rating.

J E Rogers

    Hospital Materiel Management Quarterly
    |July 7, 1992
    PubMed
    Summary
    This summary is machine-generated.

    This study introduces a quantitative scoring system (REF, C, and score) for evaluating body support product performance. This method aims to provide objective data for purchasers, ensuring informed decisions about pressure relief and product suitability.

    Related Concept Videos

    You might also read

    Related Articles

    Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

    Sort by
    Same author

    Improved method for calibration of exchange flows for a physical transport box model of Tampa Bay, FL USA.

    Journal of coastal research·2021
    Same author

    Ramucirumab for the treatment of gastroesophageal cancers.

    Expert opinion on orphan drugs·2016
    Same author

    Anaerobic biodegradation ofPara-cresol under three reducing conditions.

    Microbial ecology·2013
    Same author

    Reductive dechlorination of dichlorophenols by nonadapted and adapted microbial communities in pond sediments.

    Microbial ecology·2013
    Same author

    Onset and complications of varicella zoster reactivation in the autologous hematopoietic cell transplant population.

    Transplant infectious disease : an official journal of the Transplantation Society·2011
    Same author

    Quality assurance of medical ontologies.

    Methods of information in medicine·2006
    Same journal

    Disaster planning and resource allocation in health services.

    Hospital materiel management quarterly·2001
    Same journal

    Training for the twenty-first century in a state psychiatric facility.

    Hospital materiel management quarterly·2001
    Same journal

    Distance education in the twenty-first century.

    Hospital materiel management quarterly·2001
    Same journal

    Abstract writing.

    Hospital materiel management quarterly·2001
    Same journal

    Names are important.

    Hospital materiel management quarterly·2001
    Same journal

    The effective voice mail message.

    Hospital materiel management quarterly·2001
    See all related articles

    Area of Science:

    • Biomedical Engineering
    • Rehabilitation Engineering
    • Materials Science

    Background:

    • Current methods for evaluating body support products lack quantitative metrics.
    • Objective performance data is crucial for patient care and informed purchasing decisions.
    • Existing product assessments often fail to address specific patient needs and potential failure modes.

    Purpose of the Study:

    • To establish a feasible quantitative method for assessing body support product performance.
    • To develop a scoring system (REF, C, and score) for objective product evaluation.
    • To inform purchasers about product merits based on measurable data rather than subjective influences.

    Main Methods:

    • Development of a quantitative scoring system (REF, C, and score) for product performance.

    Related Experiment Videos

  • Focus on measurable parameters such as pressure relief and shear forces.
  • Consideration of product-specific characteristics relevant to preventing skin breakdown.

    • Main Results:

    • Demonstrated the feasibility of quantitating body support product performance.
    • Proposed a scoring system applicable to various support surfaces, including mattresses and cushions.
    • Highlighted the importance of addressing specific design characteristics to minimize pressure-related injuries.

    Conclusions:

    • A quantitative scoring system can provide objective performance data for body support products.
    • This approach empowers users with accurate information, improving product selection for specific needs.
    • The proposed method can be adapted for a wide range of assistive devices, ensuring consistent evaluation standards.