Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Consumer-focused data collection in prevention program evaluation. Rationale and illustrations.

R Spoth1, V Molgaard

  • 1Social & Behavioral Research Center for Rural Health, Iowa State University, Ames 50011.

Evaluation & the Health Professions
|August 6, 1993
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Sources of bias in Gorman critique of bias: again a need for more reasonable, valid conclusions with true dialogue.

Psychological medicine·2017
Same author

PROSPER delivery of universal preventive interventions with young adolescents: long-term effects on emerging adult substance misuse and associated risk behaviors.

Psychological medicine·2017
Same author

A model of the effects of protective parent and peer factors on young adolescent alcohol refusal skills.

The journal of primary prevention·2013
Same author

Study of participation barriers in family-focused prevention: research issues and preliminary results.

International quarterly of community health education·2010
Same author

A multicomponent minimal intervention health promotion program: preliminary results.

International quarterly of community health education·2010
Same author

Rural-urban differences in the distribution of parent-reported risk factors for substance use among young adolescents.

Journal of substance abuse·2002
Same journal

The "Twilight Zone" Is a Danger Zone: Why the Occupational-Clinical Divide in Burnout Assessment Is a False Dichotomy.

Evaluation & the health professions·2026
Same journal

Evaluating Equity in AI-Supported Functional Assessment: Agreement Between Clinician Judgment and Digital Metrics in Stroke Rehabilitation.

Evaluation & the health professions·2026
Same journal

Psychometric Properties of the Arabic Version of the PROMIS Sleep Disturbance 8b Short Form Among Nurses.

Evaluation & the health professions·2026
Same journal

Commentary: Systemic Inequities in Japan's Technical Intern Training Program (TITP): Health, Labor, and Legal Vulnerabilities of Foreign Trainees.

Evaluation & the health professions·2026
Same journal

Application of Patient-Reported Outcome Measurements in Traditional Chinese Medicine Clinical Trials for Musculoskeletal Disorders in China: A Registry-Based Analysis.

Evaluation & the health professions·2026
Same journal

Divergent Socioeconomic Pathways to Biologically Uncontrolled Diabetes by Gender: A Bayesian Analysis of NHANES 2021-2023.

Evaluation & the health professions·2026
See all related articles

This study advocates for collecting consumer feedback throughout prevention program evaluation. Gathering data on recruitment responses and delivery preferences enhances program effectiveness and participant engagement.

Area of Science:

  • Public Health
  • Program Evaluation
  • Consumer Behavior

Background:

  • Traditional program evaluation often overlooks consumer perspectives.
  • Understanding consumer engagement is crucial for effective prevention programs.
  • Existing evaluation methods may not fully capture participant experiences.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To provide a rationale for consumer-focused data collection in program evaluation.
  • To recommend specific procedures for gathering consumer insights.
  • To illustrate the application of these methods in real-world evaluations.

Main Methods:

  • Collecting data on consumer reactions to recruitment strategies.
  • Assessing consumer preferences for program delivery features.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Integrating consumer feedback at multiple stages of evaluation.

    • Main Results:

    • Consumer-focused data collection offers valuable insights beyond traditional metrics.
    • Understanding participant preferences can optimize program design and delivery.
    • Early and continuous consumer input improves program relevance and impact.

    Conclusions:

    • Implementing consumer-focused data collection is essential for robust prevention program evaluation.
    • This approach enhances program relevance, engagement, and overall effectiveness.
    • Integrating consumer insights leads to more successful and sustainable public health initiatives.