Jove
Visualize
Contact Us

Related Experiment Videos

Prioritizing services: GPs' views, fundholders versus non-fundholders.

P J Ayres1

  • 1Wakefield Healthcare, UK.

Journal of Management in Medicine
|December 9, 1993
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Rationing health care: views from general practice.

Social science & medicine (1982)·1996
Same author

Practical public health in a primary care setting. Discrete projects confer discrete benefits but a long-term relationship is needed.

Journal of management in medicine·1995
Same author

Rationing. Local debate is needed.

BMJ (Clinical research ed.)·1995
Same author

Major chemical incidents--a response, the role of the Consultant in Communicable Disease Control and the case of need for a national surveillance-resource centre.

Journal of public health medicine·1995
Same author

The distribution of dithranol or its metabolites following topical application to the skin of young white pigs.

Clinical and experimental dermatology·1979
Same author

Assessment of the skin penetration properties of different carrier vehicles for topically applied cortisol.

The British journal of dermatology·1978
Same journal

Evaluating self-managed integrated community teams.

Journal of management in medicine·2003
Same journal

Non-profit multi-hospital organizations: challenges and prospects.

Journal of management in medicine·2003
Same journal

From home, to market, to headquarters, to home. Relocating health services planning and purchasing in New Zealand.

Journal of management in medicine·2003
Same journal

Variation in coding influence across the USA. Risk and reward in reimbursement optimization.

Journal of management in medicine·2003
Same journal

Labour-management forums and workplace performance. Evidence from union officials in health care organizations.

Journal of management in medicine·2003
Same journal

A literature review of the problems of delayed presentation for treatment and non-completion of treatment for tuberculosis in less developed countries and ways of addressing these problems using particular implementations of the DOTS strategy.

Journal of management in medicine·2002
See all related articles
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

General practitioners

Area of Science:

  • Health Services Research
  • Primary Care Medicine
  • Health Policy and Management

Background:

  • District Health Authority (DHA) purchasing plans outline service priorities.
  • General Practitioners (GPs) are key stakeholders in healthcare provision.
  • Understanding alignment between DHA plans and GP views is crucial for effective healthcare delivery.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To evaluate agreement between DHA service priorities and GP perspectives.
  • To identify statistically significant differences between fundholding and non-fundholding GPs' views.
  • To assess the utility of postal questionnaires for gathering GP opinions on service prioritization.

Main Methods:

  • A postal questionnaire survey was distributed to GPs within a specific DHA catchment area.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Response rate analysis was conducted to ensure data representativeness.
  • Statistical analysis was employed to compare GP views with DHA strategy and between fundholding and non-fundholding groups.

    • Main Results:

    • A high response rate (74%) was achieved, indicating robust data collection.
    • GP views generally aligned with the District Health Authority's strategic priorities.
    • A significant difference in opinion between fundholding and non-fundholding GPs was found only in the area of lithotripsy services.

    Conclusions:

    • Postal questionnaires offer a cost-effective and efficient method for assessing GP priorities.
    • There is currently minimal divergence in decision-making perspectives between fundholding and non-fundholding GPs regarding service prioritization.
    • The study supports the alignment of local GP perspectives with established DHA strategies for service provision.