Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

The value of different screening techniques for glaucoma.

M R Wilson1, S Khanna

  • 1Jules Stein Eye Institute, University of California Los Angeles, School of Medicine.

Current Opinion in Ophthalmology
|March 9, 1994
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Viral co-infection, autoimmunity, and CSF HIV antibody profiles in HIV central nervous system escape.

Journal of neuroimmunology·2023
Same author

Task-evoked pupillary responses track precision-weighted prediction errors and learning rate during interceptive visuomotor actions.

Scientific reports·2022
Same author

Integrating central nervous system metagenomics and host response for diagnosis of tuberculosis meningitis and its mimics.

Nature communications·2022
Same author

A Rare Bird: Diagnosis of Psittacosis Meningitis by Clinical Metagenomic Next-Generation Sequencing.

Open forum infectious diseases·2021
Same author

Neurite Orientation Dispersion and Density Imaging for Assessing Acute Inflammation and Lesion Evolution in MS.

AJNR. American journal of neuroradiology·2020
Same author

Visual attention, EEG alpha power and T7-Fz connectivity are implicated in prosthetic hand control and can be optimized through gaze training.

Journal of neuroengineering and rehabilitation·2019

Glaucoma screening faces challenges as intraocular pressure and optic nerve imaging have limitations. Targeted case finding in high-risk individuals is more effective than general population screening.

Area of Science:

  • Ophthalmology and Optometry
  • Medical Diagnostics
  • Public Health

Background:

  • Intraocular pressure (IOP) measurement via tonometry is insufficient for differentiating healthy eyes from those with glaucoma.
  • Optic disc and retinal nerve-fiber layer changes may precede visual field loss in glaucoma by years, prompting efforts in biomorphometry.
  • Variability in optic nerve head topography and suboptimal fundus photograph quality limit biomorphometry's utility in screening.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To evaluate the effectiveness of current glaucoma screening methods.
  • To identify limitations of tonometry and biomorphometry for glaucoma case finding.
  • To explore the role of psychophysical testing and targeted screening approaches.

Main Methods:

  • Review of existing evidence on tonometry, optic nerve head imaging (including scanning laser ophthalmoscopy), and psychophysical testing.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Analysis of the diagnostic accuracy and limitations of each method in glaucoma detection.
  • Consideration of glaucoma prevalence in the general population and its implications for screening strategies.

    • Main Results:

    • Tonometry's role has shifted from case finding to risk stratification due to poor differentiation between healthy and glaucomatous eyes.
    • Biomorphometry, while promising for early detection, is hampered by normal anatomical variations and image quality issues.
    • Psychophysical testing is gaining importance due to the limitations of tonometry and biomorphometry in general screening.

    Conclusions:

    • Widespread glaucoma screening using a single test in the general adult population is not effective due to low prevalence and unreliable techniques.
    • Current screening methods like tonometry and fundus photography have significant limitations for accurate glaucoma diagnosis.
    • A shift towards targeted case finding in high-risk individuals is recommended over broad population-based screening.