Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Corneal topography.

L Missotten1

  • 1U.Z. St. Rafael Eye Clinic, Leuven, Belgium.

Current Opinion in Ophthalmology
|July 7, 1994
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Computer-assisted videokeratography (CAVK) systems analyze corneal topography but have limitations with aspherical surfaces. New methods improve accuracy and distinguish correctable focus errors from irregular astigmatism.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Examination, registration and analysis of clinical expressions of DVD.

Strabismus·2011
Same author

Expression of cyclo-oxygenase-2 and downstream enzymes in diabetic fibrovascular epiretinal membranes.

The British journal of ophthalmology·2008
Same author

Expression of antiapoptotic and proapoptotic molecules in diabetic retinas.

Eye (London, England)·2006
Same author

Expression of growth factors in the conjunctiva from patients with active trachoma.

Eye (London, England)·2005
Same author

Immunopathogenesis of conjunctival remodelling in vernal keratoconjunctivitis.

Eye (London, England)·2005
Same author

Inducible nitric oxide synthase and vascular endothelial growth factor are colocalized in the retinas of human subjects with diabetes.

Eye (London, England)·2004
Same journal

Laser vision correction (LASIK, PRK, SMILE) with simultaneous accelerated corneal crosslinking.

Current opinion in ophthalmology·2026
Same journal

Traumatic macular hole: observe, operate, or other options.

Current opinion in ophthalmology·2026
Same journal

The evolving role of artificial intelligence in ophthalmology: basic science, translation, and clinical integration.

Current opinion in ophthalmology·2026
Same journal

Editorial: reducing risk for refractive surgery.

Current opinion in ophthalmology·2026
Same journal

Updates on Refractive Surgery: Benefits, Risks, and Costs of Modern Treatment Options.

Current opinion in ophthalmology·2026
Same journal

Corneal Allogeneic Intrastromal Ring Segments for keratoconus - recent evidence and the move to customized and custom shaped CAIRS.

Current opinion in ophthalmology·2026
See all related articles

Area of Science:

  • Ophthalmology
  • Biomedical Engineering
  • Optometry

Background:

  • Computer-assisted videokeratography (CAVK) is the standard for corneal surface analysis.
  • Understanding CAVK system limitations is crucial for accurate data interpretation.
  • Reflection-based methods struggle with aspherical surfaces and abrupt curvature changes, like post-photorefractive keratectomy.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To highlight the limitations of current computer-assisted videokeratography systems.
  • To introduce raster stereographic methods as a theoretically advantageous alternative for true corneal topography.
  • To present novel methods for evaluating optical aberrations and differentiating correctable refractive errors from irregular astigmatism.

Main Methods:

  • Analysis of reflection-based videokeratography limitations.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Exploration of raster stereographic principles for corneal topography.
  • Development of new computational approaches for optical aberration assessment.

    • Main Results:

    • Reflection methods show reduced accuracy on aspherical surfaces and at sharp corneal edges.
    • Raster stereography offers a theoretical advantage for true topography but requires enhanced visualization and sensitivity.
    • Improved calculations approximate ideal corneal contours for better visual performance.

    Conclusions:

    • Accurate corneal topography analysis requires awareness of system limitations.
    • Advanced methods are emerging to better characterize corneal optics and guide treatment.
    • Distinguishing between correctable refractive errors and irregular astigmatism is critical for patient outcomes.