Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Comparing three head-pointing systems using a single subject design.

J Angelo1, C Deterding, J Weisman

  • 1Occupational Therapy, University at Buffalo, New York.

Assistive Technology : the Official Journal of RESNA
|December 10, 1990
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Mining real-world high dimensional structured data in medicine and its use in decision support. Some different perspectives on unknowns, interdependency, and distinguishability.

Computers in biology and medicine·2021
Same author

Ixekizumab provides persistent improvements in health-related quality of life and the sexual impact associated with moderate-to-severe genital psoriasis in adult patients during a 52-week, randomised, placebo-controlled, phase 3 clinical trial.

Journal of the European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology : JEADV·2021
Same author

Pooled safety analysis of baricitinib in adult patients with atopic dermatitis from 8 randomized clinical trials.

Journal of the European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology : JEADV·2020
Same author

Efficacy of tildrakizumab by patient demographic and disease characteristics across a phase 2b and 2 phase 3 trials in patients with moderate-to-severe chronic plaque psoriasis.

Journal of the European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology : JEADV·2020
Same author

Returning To Work After Spinal Cord InjuryA Case Study.

Work (Reading, Mass.)·2014
Same author

Technology.

Work (Reading, Mass.)·2014
Same journal

Unlocking independence: A case series on the impact of mobile device instruction in acquired communication disorders.

Assistive technology : the official journal of RESNA·2026
Same journal

The role of assistive technology in supporting university students with visual impairments.

Assistive technology : the official journal of RESNA·2026
Same journal

The biomechanical effects of 3D-printed ankle-foot orthosis in individuals with unilateral foot drop.

Assistive technology : the official journal of RESNA·2026
Same journal

Accelerating responsibly: From novelty to necessity in visual assistive technology.

Assistive technology : the official journal of RESNA·2026
Same journal

Identifying key needs for educational puzzle toys for children with hearing impairments using a Kano-AHP approach.

Assistive technology : the official journal of RESNA·2026
Same journal

Effect of mobile hoist on psychosocial and physical burden of caregivers of older adults.

Assistive technology : the official journal of RESNA·2026
See all related articles

For individuals unable to use keyboards, Head Master and LROP head control methods offer superior speed and accuracy compared to Free Wheel. This study evaluated three alternative computer input devices for users with disabilities.

Area of Science:

  • Assistive Technology
  • Human-Computer Interaction
  • Rehabilitation Engineering

Background:

  • Traditional keyboard input is inaccessible for some individuals.
  • Alternative computer input methods are crucial for users with disabilities.
  • Head-controlled interfaces offer a viable alternative for computer access.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To compare the speed and accuracy of three head-controlled computer input methods: Head Master, Free Wheel, and LROP.
  • To evaluate the effectiveness of these alternative input devices for individuals with disabilities.

Main Methods:

  • A single-subject design was employed.
  • Nine individuals with disabilities participated in the study.
  • Performance metrics included speed and accuracy of input using Head Master, Free Wheel, and LROP.

Related Experiment Videos

Main Results:

  • Visual inspection indicated higher performance with Head Master and LROP compared to Free Wheel.
  • Repeated measures analysis of variance (ANOVA) confirmed no significant difference between Head Master and LROP.
  • ANOVA revealed significant differences favoring Head Master and LROP over Free Wheel.

Conclusions:

  • Head Master and LROP demonstrate comparable and superior performance to Free Wheel for head-controlled computer input.
  • These findings support the use of Head Master and LROP as effective alternative input methods for individuals with disabilities.
  • Further research may explore user preferences and long-term usability of these head control systems.