Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Vital parts.

M W Serafini

    National Journal
    |December 21, 1995
    PubMed
    Summary

    Organ transplant waiting lists are growing, leading to organ rationing. This raises ethical questions about prioritizing patients based on sickness severity versus length of time on the waiting list.

    Related Concept Videos

    You might also read

    Related Articles

    Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

    Sort by
    Same authorSame journal

    Now, the hard part. Medicare has long defied attempts to reform it.

    National journal·1999
    Same authorSame journal

    An overture, again, on health reform.

    National journal·1999
    Same authorSame journal

    Workers of the world, insure!

    National journal·1998
    Same authorSame journal

    HMOs--the good guys again?

    National journal·1998
    Same authorSame journal

    Medicare's exodus. Congress wants more of the elderly in HMOs, but many HMOs don't want more elderly. They say they can't afford to provide benefits, and are calling it quits.

    National journal·1998
    Same author

    The toughest sell in town.

    National journal·1998

    Area of Science:

    • Medical Ethics
    • Public Health Policy
    • Transplantation Medicine

    Background:

    • Increasing demand for organ transplants has outpaced donor availability.
    • A critical shortage of vital organs necessitates rationing decisions.
    • Ethical dilemmas arise in allocating scarce life-saving resources.

    Purpose of the Study:

    • To explore the ethical considerations in organ transplant rationing.
    • To examine fairness in prioritizing patients for organ allocation.
    • To analyze the criteria for determining who receives organs first.

    Main Methods:

    • Review of current organ allocation policies.
    • Analysis of ethical frameworks for resource distribution.
    • Discussion of patient prioritization models.

    Main Results:

    • Current rationing systems face significant ethical challenges.
    • Prioritization based solely on medical urgency or wait time presents drawbacks.
    • A balanced approach considering multiple factors may be necessary.

    Conclusions:

    • Fair organ allocation requires careful consideration of ethical principles.
    • Developing transparent and equitable rationing criteria is crucial.
    • Ongoing dialogue is needed to address the organ shortage crisis.

    Related Experiment Videos