Jove
Visualize
Contact Us

Related Experiment Videos

Compensation models and issues for a multispecialty group practice.

J K Levine1

  • 1ECG Management Consultants, Wakefield, MA, USA.

The Journal of Ambulatory Care Management
|June 6, 1996
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Recruiting and selecting generalist-oriented students at New York Medical College.

Academic medicine : journal of the Association of American Medical Collegesยท1999
See all related articles
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Physician compensation models in multispecialty group practices should align with financial and strategic goals. This review examines various models and their implications, including capitated payments and integrated delivery systems.

Area of Science:

  • Healthcare Management
  • Medical Group Practice Administration
  • Physician Compensation Strategies

Background:

  • Effective physician compensation is crucial for multispecialty group practices.
  • Compensation plans must align with organizational objectives and corporate philosophy.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To present specific physician compensation models used by multispecialty group practices.
  • To review the key implications of these compensation models.

Main Methods:

  • Review of various physician compensation models within multispecialty group practices.
  • Analysis of implications related to payment structures, objectives, risk, and system integration.

Main Results:

  • Different compensation models have unique financial, strategic, and operational implications.

Related Experiment Videos

  • The shift to capitated payments presents specific challenges and considerations.
  • Integration into larger delivery systems impacts compensation strategies.

    • Conclusions:

    • Compensation methodologies must be tailored to complement a group practice's unique objectives and philosophy.
    • Understanding the implications of different models is essential for successful practice management.