Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Quality matters: junior doctors' perceptions.

K Newman1, T Pyne

  • 1Middlesex University Business School, London, UK.

Journal of Management in Medicine
|December 9, 1995
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Managing free-roaming domestic dog populations using surgical sterilisation: a randomised controlled trial.

Scientific reports·2025
Same author

The impact of low-mode symmetry on inertial fusion energy output in the burning plasma state.

Nature communications·2024
Same author

Achievement of Target Gain Larger than Unity in an Inertial Fusion Experiment.

Physical review letters·2024
Same author

Experimental achievement and signatures of ignition at the National Ignition Facility.

Physical review. E·2022
Same author

Design of an inertial fusion experiment exceeding the Lawson criterion for ignition.

Physical review. E·2022
Same author

Lawson Criterion for Ignition Exceeded in an Inertial Fusion Experiment.

Physical review letters·2022
Same journal

Evaluating self-managed integrated community teams.

Journal of management in medicine·2003
Same journal

Non-profit multi-hospital organizations: challenges and prospects.

Journal of management in medicine·2003
Same journal

From home, to market, to headquarters, to home. Relocating health services planning and purchasing in New Zealand.

Journal of management in medicine·2003
Same journal

Variation in coding influence across the USA. Risk and reward in reimbursement optimization.

Journal of management in medicine·2003
Same journal

Labour-management forums and workplace performance. Evidence from union officials in health care organizations.

Journal of management in medicine·2003
Same journal

A literature review of the problems of delayed presentation for treatment and non-completion of treatment for tuberculosis in less developed countries and ways of addressing these problems using particular implementations of the DOTS strategy.

Journal of management in medicine·2002
See all related articles

Junior doctors prioritize quality improvement over patient satisfaction, questioning the effectiveness of clinical audits. This study explores their views on healthcare quality and identifies barriers to providing optimal patient care.

Area of Science:

  • Health Services Research
  • Medical Education
  • Quality Improvement

Background:

  • Healthcare quality is paramount due to efficiency demands and rising patient expectations.
  • The "costs of quality" significantly impact healthcare budgets (30-50%).
  • Junior doctors deliver a substantial portion of medical care, making their perspectives crucial.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate junior doctors' perceptions of healthcare quality dimensions.
  • To assess junior doctors' knowledge of and participation in clinical audit.
  • To identify obstacles hindering the provision of high-quality care by junior doctors.

Main Methods:

  • Empirical study involving junior doctors.
  • Exploration of views on healthcare quality and clinical audit.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Analysis of perceived barriers to quality care.

    • Main Results:

    • Junior doctors assign a low priority to patient satisfaction.
    • This perspective contrasts with government policy and service quality philosophies.
    • Significant doubts arise regarding the role and effectiveness of clinical audit as a quality improvement tool.

    Conclusions:

    • Junior doctors' low prioritization of patient satisfaction challenges current quality improvement paradigms.
    • Obstacles identified may impede the effective implementation of clinical audit.
    • The perceptions of future medical leaders cast uncertainty on the impact of clinical audit.