Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Comparability and compatibility: issues in combining data from central cancer registries.

H L Howe1

  • 1North American Association of Central Cancer Registries, Springfield, IL, USA.

Topics in Health Information Management
|January 7, 1997
PubMed
Summary

Combining registry data requires careful evaluation of data collection, quality, and population differences. Assessing compatibility and comparability ensures meaningful results when merging datasets from different sources.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Annual report to the nation on the status of cancer (1973 through 1998), featuring cancers with recent increasing trends.

Journal of the National Cancer Institute·2001
Same author

The annual report to the nation on the status of cancer, 1973-1997, with a special section on colorectal cancer.

Cancer·2000
Same author

Increased risk of malignancy in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus.

Journal of investigative medicine : the official publication of the American Federation for Clinical Research·1998
Same author

Toward a broader definition of heat-related death: comparison of mortality estimates from medical examiners' classification with those from total death differentials during the July 1995 heat wave in Chicago, Illinois.

The American journal of forensic medicine and pathology·1998
Same author

Cancer incidence and age at northern migration of African Americans in Illinois, 1986-1991.

Ethnicity & health·1997
Same author

Effects of physician outreach programs on rural-urban differences in breast cancer management.

The Journal of rural health : official journal of the American Rural Health Association and the National Rural Health Care Association·1997

Area of Science:

  • Health Informatics
  • Biostatistics
  • Data Science

Background:

  • Healthcare data often resides in disparate registries.
  • Combining registry data can enhance statistical power and research insights.
  • Differences in data collection and quality pose challenges to data integration.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To outline critical considerations for combining or comparing data from different registries.
  • To identify key factors affecting data compatibility and comparability.
  • To guide researchers in assessing the meaningfulness of combined registry data.

Main Methods:

  • Review of methodological challenges in registry data utilization.
  • Identification of critical data attributes for comparison (e.g., demographics, quality metrics).

Related Experiment Videos

  • Framework for assessing data compatibility and comparability.

    • Main Results:

    • Population demographics, data quality metrics, and collection methods significantly impact data compatibility.
    • Compatibility does not automatically imply comparability; rigorous assessment is necessary.
    • Factors influencing data compatibility include study design, definitions, and measurement tools.

    Conclusions:

    • Thorough assessment of data collection methods, quality, and population characteristics is essential before combining or comparing registry data.
    • Compatibility and comparability are distinct but related concepts crucial for valid data integration.
    • Careful consideration of potential biases and limitations is required to ensure the meaningfulness of combined registry data.