Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Dispelling managed care myths.

M C Jennings1, C S Clark

  • 1Jennings Ryan and Kolb, Hadley, MA, USA.

Healthcare Financial Management : Journal of the Healthcare Financial Management Association
|November 3, 1997
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

The lead content of currently available new residential paint in several Asian countries.

Environmental research·2006
Same author

Lead in paint and soil in Karnataka and Gujarat, India.

Journal of occupational and environmental hygiene·2005
Same author

Portable lead analyzer to locate source of lead.

Indian journal of pediatrics·2004
Same author

Self-assembly of polymer and sheet structures from palladium(II) complexes by hydrogen bonding between carboxamide substituents.

Inorganic chemistry·2001
Same author

Self-assembly of rings, catenanes, and a doubly braided catenane containing gold(I): the hinge-group effect in diacetylide ligands.

Chemistry (Weinheim an der Bergstrasse, Germany)·2001
Same author

Mechanism of oxidative addition of mercury(II) compounds to platinum(II).

Inorganic chemistry·2001
Same journal

Highlights from the HFM blog.

Healthcare financial management : journal of the Healthcare Financial Management Association·2018
Same journal

Hospitals face challenges from Medicare cost and payment trends.

Healthcare financial management : journal of the Healthcare Financial Management Association·2018
Same journal

The fate of value-based care with an ACA repeal.

Healthcare financial management : journal of the Healthcare Financial Management Association·2018
Same journal

Beyond the Medicare annual well visit: maximizing revenue for hospital-owned practices.

Healthcare financial management : journal of the Healthcare Financial Management Association·2018
Same journal

Incorporating social determinants into population health management.

Healthcare financial management : journal of the Healthcare Financial Management Association·2018
Same journal

Health Care 2020 Part 3: Consolidation.

Healthcare financial management : journal of the Healthcare Financial Management Association·2018
See all related articles

Challenging common beliefs about managed care and capitation is crucial for healthcare providers. Many accepted ideas about physician organizations and payment models are actually myths that hinder proactive change.

Area of Science:

  • Healthcare Management
  • Health Economics
  • Policy Analysis

Background:

  • Managed care and capitation are prevalent healthcare payment models.
  • Numerous widely accepted ideas about these models are often misconceptions.
  • Healthcare providers must critically evaluate these assumptions to adapt effectively.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To identify and debunk common myths surrounding managed care and capitation.
  • To encourage healthcare providers to re-evaluate traditional thinking in managed care.
  • To promote a more proactive approach to navigating changes in healthcare delivery and reimbursement.

Main Methods:

  • Analysis of commonly held beliefs in managed care.
  • Identification of misconceptions regarding capitation and physician payment models.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Examination of assumptions about physician-hospital organizations (PHOs) and physician panel structures.

    • Main Results:

    • Beliefs that Physician-Hospital Organizations (PHOs) are merely transitional and not long-term solutions are challenged.
    • The perceived absolute conflict between fee-for-service and capitation incentives is questioned.
    • Assumptions about optimal payment structures under global capitation, including primary care physician (PCP) and specialist compensation, are re-examined.
    • The notion that small, exclusive physician panels are universally the most successful model is disputed.

    Conclusions:

    • Traditional assumptions about managed care and capitation often represent half-truths or myths.
    • Healthcare providers should critically assess these prevailing ideas to foster innovation.
    • Realigning thinking on managed care structures and incentives is essential for successful adaptation to evolving healthcare landscapes.