Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Validation of the Panic Outcomes Module.

J Hollenberg1, K M Rost, J Humphrey

  • 1Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Little Rock 72205, USA.

Evaluation & the Health Professions
|February 6, 1997
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

New Measurements of the Deuteron-to-Proton F_{2} Structure-Function Ratio.

Physical review letters·2025
Same author

Drones can be used to provide dispatch centres with on-site photos before arrival of EMS in time critical incidents.

Resuscitation·2024
Same author

Measured proton electromagnetic structure deviates from theoretical predictions.

Nature·2022
Same author

Deeply Virtual Compton Scattering Cross Section at High Bjorken x_{B}.

Physical review letters·2022
Same author

Determination of the ^{27}Al Neutron Distribution Radius from a Parity-Violating Electron Scattering Measurement.

Physical review letters·2022
Same author

Characteristics and motivational factors for joining a lay responder system dispatch to out-of-hospital cardiac arrests.

Scandinavian journal of trauma, resuscitation and emergency medicine·2022
Same journal

The "Twilight Zone" Is a Danger Zone: Why the Occupational-Clinical Divide in Burnout Assessment Is a False Dichotomy.

Evaluation & the health professions·2026
Same journal

Evaluating Equity in AI-Supported Functional Assessment: Agreement Between Clinician Judgment and Digital Metrics in Stroke Rehabilitation.

Evaluation & the health professions·2026
Same journal

Psychometric Properties of the Arabic Version of the PROMIS Sleep Disturbance 8b Short Form Among Nurses.

Evaluation & the health professions·2026
Same journal

Commentary: Systemic Inequities in Japan's Technical Intern Training Program (TITP): Health, Labor, and Legal Vulnerabilities of Foreign Trainees.

Evaluation & the health professions·2026
Same journal

Application of Patient-Reported Outcome Measurements in Traditional Chinese Medicine Clinical Trials for Musculoskeletal Disorders in China: A Registry-Based Analysis.

Evaluation & the health professions·2026
Same journal

Divergent Socioeconomic Pathways to Biologically Uncontrolled Diabetes by Gender: A Bayesian Analysis of NHANES 2021-2023.

Evaluation & the health professions·2026
See all related articles

This study validates the Panic Outcomes Module for assessing panic disorder treatment results. The module shows acceptable measurement error for group data and is suitable for outpatient mental health settings.

Area of Science:

  • Clinical Psychology
  • Psychiatric Outcomes Measurement
  • Health Services Research

Background:

  • Panic disorder requires effective outcome evaluation tools.
  • Existing modules may not be suitable for routine clinical use.
  • Assessing treatment effectiveness is crucial for patient care.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To validate a new module for evaluating clinical care outcomes in panic disorder.
  • To assess the module's reliability and validity for measuring panic disorder outcomes.
  • To determine the module's suitability for integration into outpatient mental health settings.

Main Methods:

  • Longitudinal study design.
  • Data collection from 73 patients including baseline, follow-up, and test-retest.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Cross-sectional analysis of relationships and change over time.

    • Main Results:

    • The Panic Outcomes Module demonstrates acceptable measurement error for group data.
    • The module effectively measures outcomes and case-mix characteristics.
    • The module's assessment of panic severity change shows good agreement with clinical judgment.

    Conclusions:

    • The Panic Outcomes Module is a valid tool for measuring outcomes in panic disorder specialty care.
    • The module's brevity (approx. 20 minutes) facilitates its use in clinical practice.
    • Further validation is recommended for primary care populations.