A distinction between the initiation and the continuation of response preparation
Related Experiment Video
Updated: Oct 23, 2026

Irrelevant Stimuli and Action Control: Analyzing the Influence of Ignored Stimuli via the Distractor-Response Binding Paradigm
Published on: May 14, 2014
1Department of Psychology, University of California, San Diego, USA. aaron@eeg.com
Abstract:
Previous findings suggest that motoric response preparation cannot be initiated in parallel with memory scanning. In the present study, response preparation was initiated with the aid of a precue to examine whether such preparation can be maintained or continued while memory scanning is active. In Experiment 1, each trial began with a colored square indicating which hand might be needed to respond. A probe letter's memory set membership determined whether the primed response should be made or withheld. Lateralized readiness potentials were initiated by the square precue and continued to increase after letter presentation, suggesting that once response preparation had been initiated it was continued in parallel with memory scanning. Experiment 2 suggested that the difficulty of the concurrent memory search had little effect on the continuation of response preparation. The results support the view that motoric response preparation consists of at least two qualitatively distinct phases--initiation and continuation.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Automatic Processing and Automatic Social Behavior
Principles of Classical Conditioning
During the...
Diversity in Cell Signaling Responses
Graded and Abrupt Responses
Some signaling systems generate...
Determination
Elaborative Rehearsals
The effectiveness of...
Hierarchy of Motor Control

