Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Brain death.

H R Beresford1

  • 1Cornell Law School, Ithaca, New York 14853-4901, USA. bersford@law.mail.cornell.edu

Neurologic Clinics
|April 10, 1999
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Physicians diagnose brain death using neurologic criteria. This article explores medical-legal issues in brain death determination, including diagnostic errors and conceptual disagreements, and the legal debate surrounding permanent unconsciousness.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

American Academy of Neurology qualifications and guidelines for the physician expert witness.

Neurology·2006
Same author

The Webster's dictionary: neurologists on the Internet.

Neurology·1999
Same author

The persistent vegetative state: a view across the legal divide.

Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences·1998
Same author

Medicolegal aspects of neurodiagnostic tests.

Neurologic clinics·1996
Same author

Containing partisan medical experts.

Journal of child neurology·1995
Same author

The Health Security Act: coercion and distrust for the market.

Cornell law review·1994
Same journal

Sports Neurology.

Neurologic clinics·2026
Same journal

Sports-Related Peripheral Nerve Injuries.

Neurologic clinics·2026
Same journal

Active Rehabilitation and Return to Play in Sports-Related Concussion.

Neurologic clinics·2026
Same journal

Autonomic Assessment and Management in Sports-Related Concussion.

Neurologic clinics·2026
Same journal

Management of Vestibular Symptoms in Sports-Related Concussion.

Neurologic clinics·2026
Same journal

Neuropsychological Assessment in Sport-Related Concussion: Evidence, Controversies, and Clinical Applications.

Neurologic clinics·2026
See all related articles

Area of Science:

  • Medical Law
  • Neurology
  • Bioethics

Background:

  • Current US law permits physicians to declare brain death based on established neurologic criteria.
  • Determining brain death involves assessing the irreversible loss of all brain function.
  • Legal and ethical considerations surround the definition and diagnosis of brain death.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To provide a medical-legal analysis of challenges in diagnosing brain death.
  • To examine conceptual and diagnostic issues complicating the application of neurologic criteria.
  • To address the legal debate on expanding brain death to include permanent unconsciousness.

Main Methods:

  • Review of current US statutes and case law regarding brain death.
  • Analysis of medical literature on neurologic criteria for brain death determination.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Examination of ethical and legal arguments concerning permanent unconsciousness.

    • Main Results:

    • Potential for diagnostic errors in applying neurologic criteria exists.
    • Conceptual disagreements may hinder the consistent diagnosis of brain death.
    • Legal distinctions between brain death and persistent vegetative state are often blurred in practice.

    Conclusions:

    • Accurate diagnosis of brain death requires careful application of neurologic criteria.
    • The conflation of brain death with permanent unconsciousness presents legal and ethical challenges.
    • Existing legal frameworks distinguish brain death from persistent vegetative state, yet life support removal is authorized in cases of permanent unconsciousness.