Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Expert witness testimony: An update.

M I Weintraub1

  • 1Department of Neurology, New York Medical College, Valhalla, New York, USA.

Neurologic Clinics
|April 10, 1999
PubMed
Summary

Expert witness testimony in malpractice cases is crucial. This review examines expert qualifications, medical organization oversight, peer review, and physician immunity in litigation.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Shiatsu massage therapy: a remarkable healing technique in spine pain.

Journal of back and musculoskeletal rehabilitation·2014
Same author

Neuromagnetic treatment of pain in refractory carpal tunnel syndrome: An electrophysiological and placebo analysis.

Journal of back and musculoskeletal rehabilitation·2012
Same author

Malpractice claims: outcome evidence. Lawyers, litigation, and liability: can they make patients safer?

Neurology·2001
Same author

Are magnets effective for pain control?

JAMA·2000
Same author

Chronic dizziness among older adults.

Annals of internal medicine·2000
Same author

Medical expert witnesses.

Lancet (London, England)·1999

Area of Science:

  • Medical Malpractice Law
  • Expert Witness Testimony
  • Legal Medicine

Background:

  • Malpractice trials often hinge on expert witness testimony.
  • Physicians may seek lucrative cases by highlighting credentials.
  • The role and regulation of experts are critical in litigation.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To provide an overview of expert witness testimony in malpractice cases.
  • To define the criteria for an expert witness.
  • To discuss the oversight mechanisms and protections for physicians.

Main Methods:

  • Literature review of expert witness testimony.
  • Analysis of medical organizations' roles.
  • Examination of peer review processes and physician immunity.

Main Results:

  • The article defines the qualifications and responsibilities of expert witnesses.
  • It explores the oversight functions of medical organizations.
  • It discusses the peer review process and implications of physician immunity.

Conclusions:

  • Understanding expert witness roles is vital in malpractice litigation.
  • Oversight and peer review are key components of medical professional accountability.
  • Physician immunity in testimony is a significant legal consideration.

Related Experiment Videos