Related Experiment Videos
Diagnosing bladder outlet obstruction in women
1Department of Urology, New York University Medical Center, New York, USA.
The Journal of Urology
|April 21, 1999
Summary
This study proposes video urodynamic criteria to diagnose female bladder outlet obstruction, finding obstructed women have lower flow rates and higher pressures. Visualizing the bladder outlet during voiding is crucial for accurate diagnosis.
Area of Science:
- Urology
- Female Pelvic Medicine
- Diagnostic Imaging
Background:
- Diagnosing female bladder outlet obstruction lacks universally accepted urodynamic criteria.
- Standard criteria for men may lead to missed diagnoses in women due to differing voiding dynamics.
Purpose of the Study:
- To propose video urodynamic criteria for diagnosing bladder outlet obstruction in women.
- To describe and compare urodynamic findings in obstructed versus unobstructed women.
Main Methods:
- Reviewed 331 women with nonneurogenic voiding dysfunction undergoing multichannel video urodynamics.
- Classified 261 women based on radiographic evidence of bladder outlet obstruction during voiding with sustained detrusor contraction.
- Compared maximum flow rate, detrusor pressure, post-void residual, bladder capacity, and detrusor instability between groups.
Main Results:
- 76 women met obstruction criteria. Common causes included dysfunctional voiding, cystocele, and primary bladder neck obstruction.
- Obstructed women had significantly lower maximum flow rates (9 vs. 20.2 ml/s) and higher detrusor pressures (42.8 vs. 22.1 cm H2O) and post-void residual (157 vs. 33 ml).
- No significant differences were observed in bladder capacity or detrusor instability incidence.
Conclusions:
- Proposed video urodynamic criteria identified significantly different voiding pressures, flow rates, and residuals between obstructed and unobstructed women.
- Absolute voiding pressure values in obstructed women are less dramatic than in men.
- Simultaneous imaging of the bladder outlet during voiding is essential for accurate obstruction diagnosis, as pressure-flow studies alone may be insufficient.