Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 28, 2026

An Improved Mechanical Testing Method to Assess Bone-implant Anchorage
Published on: February 10, 2014
Manual closing torque in five implant abutment systems: an in vitro comparative study
1The Maurice and Gabriela Goldschleger School of Dental Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Israel. grossmd@post.tau.ac.il
Manual tightening of abutment/implant (A/I) assemblies often fails to reach recommended torque levels. Significant variations in closing torque exist between operators and implant systems, highlighting potential issues with manual drivers.
Area of Science:
- Dental Implantology
- Biomaterials Engineering
- Prosthodontics
Background:
- Abutment/implant (A/I) assemblies are prone to loosening under functional loads.
- Ensuring adequate preload is critical for the long-term stability of dental restorations.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the maximum manual closing torque applied to abutment/implant assemblies.
- To compare manually generated torque with manufacturer-recommended closing torque values across five dental implant systems.
Main Methods:
- An in vitro study utilizing a mannequin and torque gauge assembly.
- Nine operators applied closing torque using five different manual torque drivers.
- Torque measurements were recorded for both habitual and maximum manual closures.
Main Results:
- Significant differences in closing torque were observed between operators (P <.0001) and implant systems (P <.0001).
- Mean closing torque ranged from 7 to 14.6 N/cm for habitual closures and 9.4 to 19.9 N/cm for maximum closures.
- Maximum manual closure torque did not reach recommended levels for any tested system.
Conclusions:
- Manual tightening of abutment/implant assemblies frequently fails to achieve recommended torque values.
- Substantial interoperator and intraoperator variability exists in manual torque application.
- Driver diameter and grip likely influence the generation of closing torque.
More Related Videos
05:54Real-Time Dynamic Navigation System for the Precise Quad-Zygomatic Implant Placement in a Patient with a Severely Atrophic Maxilla
Published on: October 18, 2021
06:36Effects of Mechanical Methods Used in Peri-implantitis Treatment on Implant Surface Decontamination and Roughness
Published on: March 14, 2025