Related Experiment Videos
Immune responses to training: how critical is training volume?
1Graduate Programme in Exercise Sciences, University of Toronto, Canada.
Summary
Low-volume training enhances immune cell counts, while moderate exercise may reduce B cell numbers. Optimal training regimens balance exercise intensity and immune response.
Area of Science:
- Exercise immunology
- Sports science
- Human physiology
Background:
- High-volume exercise can induce negative energy balance, potentially negating immune benefits.
- Understanding the impact of training volume on immune function is crucial for optimizing health outcomes.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate the effects of different training volumes on immune cell profiles in sedentary males.
- To determine the optimal exercise regimen for enhancing immune function without adverse effects.
Main Methods:
- 33 healthy sedentary males (19-29 years) underwent 12 weeks of light or moderate aerobic training, or served as controls.
- Immune cell subsets (leukocytes, CD3+, CD4+, CD8+, CD16+, CD19+, CD25+), cytolytic activity, and cell proliferation were measured.
- Peak oxygen intake and exercise challenge responses were assessed before and after the intervention.
Main Results:
- Moderate training increased aerobic power and reduced body fat, while light training showed less physiological change.
- Both training groups exhibited increased CD16+ and CD16+CD56+ natural killer cell counts and reduced post-exercise suppression.
- Light training decreased CD3+ and CD4+ T-cell counts, while moderate training reduced B cell (CD19+) counts.
Conclusions:
- Low-volume training appears optimal for enhancing specific immune cell populations, particularly cytotoxic cells.
- Moderate training, sufficient to cause negative energy balance, resulted in diminished B cell counts.
- Exercise regimens should be carefully considered to maximize immune benefits and avoid potential negative consequences on immune cell subsets.