Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Evaluating continuing education: a focus on the client.

P Woog, R B Hyman

    Evaluation & the Health Professions
    |May 11, 1980
    PubMed
    Summary
    This summary is machine-generated.

    Related Concept Videos

    You might also read

    Related Articles

    Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

    Sort by
    Same author

    Predictors of hospital length of stay and nursing home placement in an elderly medical population.

    Journal of the American Medical Directors Association·2003
    Same author

    Characteristics of suicidality among adolescents.

    Suicide & life-threatening behavior·1996
    Same author

    Five factor model of schizophrenia: replication across samples.

    Schizophrenia research·1995
    Same author

    Reassessment of circadian profile of blood pressure and heart rate in diabetic patients with autonomic neuropathy.

    Journal of cardiology·1995
    Same author

    Smoking, dietary, and breast and cervical cancer screening knowledge and screening practices of employees in an urban medical center.

    Journal of cancer education : the official journal of the American Association for Cancer Education·1995
    Same author

    Health Belief Model variables as predictors of screening mammography utilization.

    Journal of behavioral medicine·1994
    Same journal

    The "Twilight Zone" Is a Danger Zone: Why the Occupational-Clinical Divide in Burnout Assessment Is a False Dichotomy.

    Evaluation & the health professions·2026
    Same journal

    Evaluating Equity in AI-Supported Functional Assessment: Agreement Between Clinician Judgment and Digital Metrics in Stroke Rehabilitation.

    Evaluation & the health professions·2026
    Same journal

    Psychometric Properties of the Arabic Version of the PROMIS Sleep Disturbance 8b Short Form Among Nurses.

    Evaluation & the health professions·2026
    Same journal

    Commentary: Systemic Inequities in Japan's Technical Intern Training Program (TITP): Health, Labor, and Legal Vulnerabilities of Foreign Trainees.

    Evaluation & the health professions·2026
    Same journal

    Application of Patient-Reported Outcome Measurements in Traditional Chinese Medicine Clinical Trials for Musculoskeletal Disorders in China: A Registry-Based Analysis.

    Evaluation & the health professions·2026
    Same journal

    Divergent Socioeconomic Pathways to Biologically Uncontrolled Diabetes by Gender: A Bayesian Analysis of NHANES 2021-2023.

    Evaluation & the health professions·2026
    See all related articles

    This study evaluated a continuing education project for mental health professionals, finding that diverse evaluation strategies are crucial for assessing impact on staff and clients.

    Area of Science:

    • Mental Health Professional Education
    • Program Evaluation Methodology
    • Clinical Psychology

    Background:

    • Continuing education is vital for mental health professionals.
    • Assessing the impact of training programs on clinical practice and client outcomes is complex.
    • The National Institute of Mental Health (NIMH) funded a project to enhance mental health professional skills.

    Purpose of the Study:

    • To present the evaluation methodology for an NIMH-funded continuing education project.
    • To assess the impact of the training on participants' perceptions, knowledge, attitudes, and clinical behaviors.
    • To evaluate the project's influence on the work environment, ward atmosphere, and client status.

    Main Methods:

    • A controlled experimental design with pretest, posttest, and follow-up.

    Related Experiment Videos

  • Utilized 48 quantifiable and 2 qualitative dependent measures.
  • Included 96 participants completing the course in three cycles, impacting 1700 staff and 6913 clients.

    • Main Results:

    • Data collected on participant perceptions, knowledge, attitudes, and clinical behaviors.
    • Assessed changes in work environment, ward atmosphere, and client status.
    • Identified challenges in implementing the planned evaluation design.

    Conclusions:

    • The evaluation findings highlight the need for varied and adaptable evaluation strategies.
    • Effectiveness of continuing education programs requires robust and flexible assessment methods.
    • Future program evaluations should consider the complexities of measuring impact in real-world clinical settings.