Related Experiment Videos
Indexing civil commitment in psychiatric emergency rooms.
The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science
|February 9, 1986
Summary
A new tool, the Three Ratings of Involuntary Admissibility (TRIAD) index, reliably measures clinicians' legal criteria for involuntary commitment in psychiatric emergency rooms, predicting patient disposition.
Area of Science:
- Psychiatry
- Legal Medicine
- Clinical Psychology
Background:
- Involuntary commitment decisions in psychiatric emergency rooms rely on legal criteria.
- Assessing these criteria consistently is crucial for patient care and legal adherence.
- Existing methods may lack reliability or clear structure for clinicians.
Purpose of the Study:
- To develop and validate a reliable index for assessing involuntary commitment criteria.
- To evaluate the interrater reliability of the developed index.
- To determine the index's ability to predict patient disposition decisions.
Main Methods:
- Development of the Three Ratings of Involuntary Admissibility (TRIAD) index.
- Application of TRIAD by psychiatric emergency room clinicians.
- Calculation of interrater reliability coefficients (Pearson's r) for TRIAD subscales.
- Analysis of TRIAD scores' correlation with actual patient disposition decisions.
Main Results:
- High interrater reliability was achieved for danger-to-self (0.94), danger-to-other (0.89), and total admissibility (0.89) scores.
- The grave-disability score showed good reliability (0.77).
- TRIAD scores explained 82% of 89 disposition decisions in two metropolitan psychiatric emergency rooms.
Conclusions:
- Psychiatric emergency room clinicians share common constructs regarding danger to self, danger to others, and grave disability.
- These constructs are reliably applied in clinical practice using the TRIAD system.
- The TRIAD index is a valid measure and a predictable tool for patient disposition in involuntary commitment cases.