Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

How to construct a subjective index.

F Alemi, D H Gustafson, M Johnson

    Evaluation & the Health Professions
    |February 9, 1986
    PubMed
    Summary
    This summary is machine-generated.

    This study introduces a method for creating quantitative indices using expert opinions and Bayesian models. Subjective methods, when guided properly, can be as accurate as objective ones for index construction.

    Related Concept Videos

    You might also read

    Related Articles

    Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

    Sort by
    Same author

    Canadian Surgery Forum: Abstracts of presentations to the Annual Meetings of the Canadian Association of Bariatric Physicians and Surgeons, Canadian Association of General Surgeons, Canadian Association of Thoracic Surgeons, Canadian Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary Association, Canadian Society of Surgical Oncology, Canadian Society of Colon and Rectal Surgeons, Vancouver, BC, Sept. 17-21, 2013.

    Canadian journal of surgery. Journal canadien de chirurgie·2025
    Same author

    Integrating expert judgment in veterinary epidemiology: example guidance for disease freedom surveillance.

    Preventive veterinary medicine·2012
    Same author

    Differences in patient and clinic characteristics at CARE Act funded versus non-CARE Act funded HIV clinics.

    AIDS care·2004
    Same author

    A survey of 92 quality improvement projects.

    The Joint Commission journal on quality improvement·2001
    Same author

    Tutorial on risk-adjusted P-charts.

    Quality management in health care·2001
    Same author

    CHESS: ten years of research and development in consumer health informatics for broad populations, including the underserved.

    Studies in health technology and informatics·2001
    Same journal

    The "Twilight Zone" Is a Danger Zone: Why the Occupational-Clinical Divide in Burnout Assessment Is a False Dichotomy.

    Evaluation & the health professions·2026
    Same journal

    Evaluating Equity in AI-Supported Functional Assessment: Agreement Between Clinician Judgment and Digital Metrics in Stroke Rehabilitation.

    Evaluation & the health professions·2026
    Same journal

    Psychometric Properties of the Arabic Version of the PROMIS Sleep Disturbance 8b Short Form Among Nurses.

    Evaluation & the health professions·2026
    Same journal

    Commentary: Systemic Inequities in Japan's Technical Intern Training Program (TITP): Health, Labor, and Legal Vulnerabilities of Foreign Trainees.

    Evaluation & the health professions·2026
    Same journal

    Application of Patient-Reported Outcome Measurements in Traditional Chinese Medicine Clinical Trials for Musculoskeletal Disorders in China: A Registry-Based Analysis.

    Evaluation & the health professions·2026
    Same journal

    Divergent Socioeconomic Pathways to Biologically Uncontrolled Diabetes by Gender: A Bayesian Analysis of NHANES 2021-2023.

    Evaluation & the health professions·2026
    See all related articles

    Area of Science:

    • Decision Science
    • Bayesian Statistics
    • Psychometrics

    Background:

    • Quantitative indices are crucial for decision-making and measurement.
    • Traditional index construction often relies on objective data, which may not capture all relevant factors.
    • Subjective expert opinions, while valuable, require structured methods for reliable index development.

    Purpose of the Study:

    • To present a novel method for constructing quantitative indices based on expert judgment.
    • To demonstrate the integration of Bayesian probability models with panel opinions for index creation.
    • To highlight the advantages of face validity and ease of construction in the proposed method.

    Main Methods:

    • Utilizing a panel of experts to provide subjective opinions.

    Related Experiment Videos

  • Employing a Bayesian probability model to synthesize expert judgments into a quantitative index.
  • Developing specific guidelines for soliciting and processing expert opinions.

    • Main Results:

    • The proposed method effectively combines subjective expert opinions with a Bayesian framework to generate a quantitative index.
    • The constructed indices demonstrate face validity and are relatively easy to develop.
    • Evidence suggests that guided subjective methods can achieve accuracy comparable to objective approaches.

    Conclusions:

    • Expert opinion, when systematically gathered and analyzed using Bayesian models, provides a valid and practical approach to quantitative index construction.
    • The method offers a valuable alternative or complement to purely objective index-building techniques.
    • Further research and application of these guidelines can enhance the reliability and utility of expert-based indices.