Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Comparing self- and supervisor evaluations: a different view.

P Kolm, S J Verhulst

    Evaluation & the Health Professions
    |February 9, 1987
    PubMed
    Summary
    This summary is machine-generated.

    Related Concept Videos

    You might also read

    Related Articles

    Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

    Sort by
    Same author

    Biocompatibility of single-walled carbon nanotube composites for bone regeneration.

    Bone & joint research·2015
    Same author

    Rasch analysis of professional behavior in medical education.

    Advances in health sciences education : theory and practice·2015
    Same author

    Expression of CXCR3 and its ligands CXCL9, -10 and -11 in paediatric opsoclonus-myoclonus syndrome.

    Clinical and experimental immunology·2013
    Same author

    Direct renin inhibition improves parasympathetic function in diabetes.

    Diabetes, obesity & metabolism·2012
    Same author

    PSA response to secondary androgen deprivation following failed treatment of metastatic prostate cancer with the antiandrogen casodex.

    Urologic oncology·2011
    Same author

    Glucose challenge test screening for prediabetes and undiagnosed diabetes.

    Diabetologia·2009
    Same journal

    The "Twilight Zone" Is a Danger Zone: Why the Occupational-Clinical Divide in Burnout Assessment Is a False Dichotomy.

    Evaluation & the health professions·2026
    Same journal

    Evaluating Equity in AI-Supported Functional Assessment: Agreement Between Clinician Judgment and Digital Metrics in Stroke Rehabilitation.

    Evaluation & the health professions·2026
    Same journal

    Psychometric Properties of the Arabic Version of the PROMIS Sleep Disturbance 8b Short Form Among Nurses.

    Evaluation & the health professions·2026
    Same journal

    Commentary: Systemic Inequities in Japan's Technical Intern Training Program (TITP): Health, Labor, and Legal Vulnerabilities of Foreign Trainees.

    Evaluation & the health professions·2026
    Same journal

    Application of Patient-Reported Outcome Measurements in Traditional Chinese Medicine Clinical Trials for Musculoskeletal Disorders in China: A Registry-Based Analysis.

    Evaluation & the health professions·2026
    Same journal

    Divergent Socioeconomic Pathways to Biologically Uncontrolled Diabetes by Gender: A Bayesian Analysis of NHANES 2021-2023.

    Evaluation & the health professions·2026
    See all related articles

    Self-assessments offer more detailed insights into resident performance during medical training compared to supervisor evaluations. This study suggests self-ratings are more discriminating across various performance areas.

    Area of Science:

    • Medical Education
    • Performance Evaluation

    Background:

    • Congruence between self and supervisor performance ratings in medical training is often lacking.
    • Supervisor evaluations may rely on overall impressions, while self-evaluations are more nuanced.

    Purpose of the Study:

    • To investigate the differences in performance evaluation between residents and supervisors in medical training.
    • To determine if self-evaluations are more discriminating than supervisor evaluations.

    Main Methods:

    • Comparison of self- and supervisor ratings across 13 performance areas for first-year residents.
    • Factor analysis of both supervisor and self-ratings to identify underlying evaluation structures.

    Main Results:

    • Higher correlations were observed among supervisor ratings across performance areas, suggesting a more global assessment.

    Related Experiment Videos

  • Factor analysis revealed two factors for supervisors versus three for self-ratings, indicating greater differentiation in self-assessments.

    • Conclusions:

    • Self-ratings appear to be more discriminating than supervisor ratings in assessing resident performance across multiple areas.
    • Findings support the hypothesis that self-evaluations capture finer distinctions in performance compared to supervisor feedback.