Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Peer review in quality assurance.

C K Warner1

  • 1Harvard Community Health Plan, Brookline, MA 02146.

HMO Practice
|August 7, 1989
PubMed
Summary

Peer review is a valuable quality assurance tool for clinicians. A nonjudgmental approach focused on problem-solving, not blame, drives significant quality improvement in healthcare.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Tissue diagnosis of Ehrlichia chaffeensis in patients with fatal ehrlichiosis by use of immunohistochemistry, in situ hybridization, and polymerase chain reaction.

The American journal of tropical medicine and hygiene·2001
Same author

A comparative study of the fluorescent antibody test for rabies diagnosis in fresh and formalin-fixed brain tissue specimens.

Journal of virological methods·2001
Same author

Laboratory investigation of human deaths from vampire bat rabies in Peru.

The American journal of tropical medicine and hygiene·1999
Same author

An evaluation of immunofluorescence and PCR methods for detection of rabies in archival Carnoy-fixed, paraffin-embedded brain tissue.

Zentralblatt fur Veterinarmedizin. Reihe B. Journal of veterinary medicine. Series B·1999
Same author

Morphologic and molecular evidence of a dual species ehrlichial infection in a dog presenting with inflammatory central nervous system disease.

Journal of veterinary internal medicine·1998
Same author

Procedures for reproducible detection of rabies virus antigen mRNA and genome in situ in formalin-fixed tissues.

Journal of virological methods·1997

Area of Science:

  • Healthcare Quality Improvement
  • Clinical Peer Review
  • Medical Auditing

Background:

  • Effective quality assurance is crucial in healthcare delivery.
  • Clinicians have various methods to evaluate patient care.
  • The success of peer review hinges on a supportive, nonjudgmental atmosphere.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To highlight the effectiveness of peer review as a quality assurance mechanism.
  • To emphasize the importance of a nonjudgmental environment in clinical evaluations.
  • To demonstrate how peer review facilitates problem identification and resolution for quality improvement.

Main Methods:

  • Review of established methodologies for clinical care evaluation.
  • Analysis of factors contributing to successful peer review processes.
  • Focus on a problem-solving approach rather than punitive measures.

Main Results:

  • Peer review, when conducted appropriately, serves as an effective quality assurance tool.
  • A supportive, nonjudgmental environment is key to successful peer review.
  • Shifting the focus to problem identification and solving leads to genuine quality improvement.

Conclusions:

  • Peer review is a powerful instrument for enhancing healthcare quality.
  • Cultivating a nonjudgmental review culture is essential for maximizing its benefits.
  • Problem-solving-oriented peer review directly contributes to improved patient care standards.

Related Experiment Videos