Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Cost effectiveness. How should it be determined?

R G Beaves, H Joseph, J E Rohrer

    Evaluation & the Health Professions
    |May 9, 1988
    PubMed
    Summary
    This summary is machine-generated.

    Related Concept Videos

    You might also read

    Related Articles

    Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

    Sort by
    Same author

    Atherosclerosis and Liver Function Tests in Coronary Angiography Patients.

    The West Indian medical journal·2015
    Same author

    Characterization of Coconut cadang-cadang viroid variants from oil palm affected by orange spotting disease in Malaysia.

    Archives of virology·2013
    Same author

    Epidemiological assessment of continuing transmission of lymphatic filariasis in Samoa.

    Annals of tropical medicine and parasitology·2012
    Same author

    An optimized method for extraction and detection of Coconut cadang-cadang viroid(CCCVd) from oil palm.

    Communications in agricultural and applied biological sciences·2011
    Same author

    O-Methoxylated C-glycosylflavones from Justicia pectoralis.

    Journal of natural products·2011
    Same author

    Correlation of iron and colon adenomas.

    Gastroenterologie clinique et biologique·2009
    Same journal

    Signal versus Diagnosis: From Burnout Risk Screening to Care.

    Evaluation & the health professions·2026
    Same journal

    The "Twilight Zone" Is a Danger Zone: Why the Occupational-Clinical Divide in Burnout Assessment Is a False Dichotomy.

    Evaluation & the health professions·2026
    Same journal

    Evaluating Equity in AI-Supported Functional Assessment: Agreement Between Clinician Judgment and Digital Metrics in Stroke Rehabilitation.

    Evaluation & the health professions·2026
    Same journal

    Psychometric Properties of the Arabic Version of the PROMIS Sleep Disturbance 8b Short Form Among Nurses.

    Evaluation & the health professions·2026
    Same journal

    Commentary: Systemic Inequities in Japan's Technical Intern Training Program (TITP): Health, Labor, and Legal Vulnerabilities of Foreign Trainees.

    Evaluation & the health professions·2026
    Same journal

    Application of Patient-Reported Outcome Measurements in Traditional Chinese Medicine Clinical Trials for Musculoskeletal Disorders in China: A Registry-Based Analysis.

    Evaluation & the health professions·2026
    See all related articles

    This study compares cost-effectiveness, cost-benefit, and net benefit indices. Net benefit, not ratios alone, accurately determines the relative cost-effectiveness of competing health strategies.

    Area of Science:

    • Health Economics
    • Decision Analysis
    • Pharmacoeconomics

    Background:

    • Cost-effectiveness analysis is crucial for resource allocation in healthcare.
    • Various metrics exist to evaluate the economic value of health interventions.
    • Understanding the nuances of these metrics is essential for accurate interpretation.

    Purpose of the Study:

    • To compare three common cost-effectiveness indices: cost-effectiveness ratio, cost-benefit ratio, and net benefit.
    • To clarify the relationship between these indices and the traditional economic definition of cost-effectiveness.
    • To establish the correct method for determining the relative cost-effectiveness of competing strategies.

    Main Methods:

    • Theoretical comparison of cost-effectiveness ratio, cost-benefit ratio, and net benefit.

    Related Experiment Videos

  • Analysis of the conditions under which these indices are consistent.
  • Examination of the role of the dollar value of health benefits in interpreting cost-effectiveness ratios.

    • Main Results:

    • The cost-effectiveness ratio, cost-benefit ratio, and net benefit can be interpreted consistently with each other and with the traditional economic definition.
    • Relative cost-effectiveness of competing strategies is determined by comparing net benefits, not solely by comparing cost-benefit or cost-effectiveness ratios.
    • Cost-effectiveness ratios require consideration of the monetary value of health benefits for proper interpretation.

    Conclusions:

    • Net benefit is the appropriate metric for comparing the cost-effectiveness of different health strategies.
    • A clear understanding of the valuation of health benefits is necessary for accurate cost-effectiveness analysis.
    • This framework enhances the economic evaluation of healthcare interventions.