Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 7, 2026

The Adjuvant Efficacy of Angong Niuhuang Pill in the Treatment of Viral Encephalitis: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials
Published on: April 19, 2024
Bias and variability in clinical research
1Department of Orthodontics, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, NC 27599-7450, USA.
Abstract:
Two of the practical problems facing investigators attempting to compare alternative orthodontic treatments are bias and variability. Since the subjects receiving treatments are usually different people, observed differences can be due to differences in people rather than differences in the treatments. If the groups being evaluated differ in any systematic way, they are said to be biased. Treatment comparisons between biased groups are difficult to interpret since bias can exaggerate, nullify or reverse true differences. The random assignment of patients to alternative treatments breaks any systematic connection between treatment and any variable that might favor one treatment over another; thus, making it safer to attribute differences in outcome to the treatments given rather than the people studied.
Related Concept Videos
Blind Procedures
Bias
In statistics, a sampling bias is created when a sample is collected from a population, and some members of the population are not as likely to be chosen as others (remember, each member...
Variability: Analysis
The range is a simple measure of variability, indicating the difference between the highest and...
Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches
Non-controlled studies, commonly employed for initial exploration, lack a control group, rendering them susceptible to biases and external influences. In contrast, controlled...
Confounding in Epidemiological Studies
Bias in Epidemiological Studies