Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Bone and bone substitutes.

H F Nasr1, M E Aichelmann-Reidy, R A Yukna

  • 1Department of Periodontics, School of Dentistry, Louisiana State University Medical Center, New Orleans, USA.

Periodontology 2000
|May 13, 1999
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Efficacy of calculus removal from furcations using a Fissurotomy Bur in vitro.

The Journal of the Western Society of Periodontology/Periodontal abstracts·2007
Same author

Crown lengthening in the esthetic zone.

Atlas of the oral and maxillofacial surgery clinics of North America·2002
Same author

The semilunar flap technique for root coverage.

Atlas of the oral and maxillofacial surgery clinics of North America·2002
Same author

An economic evaluation of a chlorhexidine chip for treating chronic periodontitis: the CHIP (chlorhexidine in periodontitis) study.

Journal of the American Dental Association (1939)·2002
Same author

Clinical comparison of microporous biocompatible composite of PMMA, PHEMA and calcium hydroxide grafts and expanded polytetrafluoroethylene barrier membranes in human mandibular molar Class II furcations. A case series.

Journal of periodontology·2001
Same author

Clinical evaluation of acellular allograft dermis for the treatment of human gingival recession.

Journal of periodontology·2001
Same journal

Patient-centered perspectives and feelings on peri-implantitis and its therapy.

Periodontology 2000·2026
Same journal

Of mice and men-The emerging oral-gut-brain axis of health and disease.

Periodontology 2000·2026
Same journal

Effects of non-surgical periodontal therapy on intrabony periodontal defects at different re-evaluation time points: A systematic review of randomized controlled trials and clinical recommendations.

Periodontology 2000·2026
Same journal

Improving periodontal regeneration outcomes with hyaluronic acid: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Periodontology 2000·2026
Same journal

Does adherence to supportive periodontal care lower the risk of caries and related tooth loss? A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Periodontology 2000·2026
Same journal

Long-term stability of periodontal plastic surgery featuring traditional autogenous graft and coronally advanced flap alone.

Periodontology 2000·2026
See all related articles

Bone replacement grafts are crucial for periodontal regeneration, acting primarily as osteoconductive scaffolds. Different graft types show similar clinical outcomes in reducing probing depth and increasing attachment levels.

Area of Science:

  • Periodontal regenerative therapy
  • Biomaterials in dentistry
  • Bone grafting techniques

Background:

  • Bone replacement grafts are essential in periodontal and regenerative therapies.
  • Available graft options include autogenous, allogeneic, xenogeneic, and alloplastic materials.
  • Most bone grafts function as osteoconductive scaffolds rather than providing osteogenic or osteoinductive properties.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To review the role and outcomes of various bone replacement grafts in periodontal regenerative therapy.
  • To compare the clinical effectiveness of different bone graft materials.

Main Methods:

  • Review of clinical studies reporting on bone replacement grafts in periodontal osseous defects.
  • Comparison of outcomes between bone grafting and flap debridement alone.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Analysis of histological and clinical results across different graft types.

    • Main Results:

    • Bone replacement grafts significantly decrease clinical probing depth and increase clinical attachment compared to flap debridement alone.
    • While histological outcomes may differ among graft types, clinical results for probing depth reduction, attachment level gain, and defect fill are comparable.
    • All reviewed bone replacement grafts demonstrated similar overall clinical efficacy.

    Conclusions:

    • Bone replacement grafts are effective in treating periodontal osseous defects, offering comparable clinical benefits regardless of material type.
    • These grafts primarily serve as osteoconductive scaffolds, facilitating bone regeneration.
    • The choice of bone graft material should consider histological outcomes, but clinical results are generally consistent across types.