Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Regulating the genetic revolution.

T Caulfield1, M Hirtle

  • 1Faculties of Law and Medicine, Health Law Institute, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada. tcaulfld@law.ualberta.ca

Molecular Medicine Today
|May 14, 1999
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Bayesian emulation and history matching of JUNE.

Philosophical transactions. Series A, Mathematical, physical, and engineering sciences·2022
Same author

Genome Canada precision medicine strategy for structured national implementation of epitope matching in renal transplantation.

Human immunology·2022
Same author

Mental health of staff working in intensive care during Covid-19.

Occupational medicine (Oxford, England)·2021
Same author

Economic consequences incurred by living kidney donors: a Canadian multi-center prospective study.

American journal of transplantation : official journal of the American Society of Transplantation and the American Society of Transplant Surgeons·2014
Same author

Science and the sources of hype.

Public health genomics·2012
Same author

DTC genetic testing: pendulum swings and policy paradoxes.

Clinical genetics·2011

Genetic research advances necessitate social control and government oversight, as seen with human cloning regulations. However, creating effective genetic policy presents significant challenges.

Area of Science:

  • Genetics and Genomics
  • Bioethics
  • Science Policy

Background:

  • Rapid advancements in genetic research are outpacing societal understanding and ethical frameworks.
  • Public perception calls for social control and government regulation of genetic technologies.
  • The prospect of human cloning has intensified discussions around regulatory action.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To explore the societal implications of rapid genetic research breakthroughs.
  • To examine the growing demand for social control and government oversight in genetic research.
  • To analyze the challenges associated with legislating genetic policy.

Main Methods:

  • Literature review of scientific advancements in genetics.
  • Analysis of public discourse and media representation of genetic research.
Keywords:
Biomedical and Behavioral ResearchGenetics and ReproductionLegal Approach

Related Experiment Videos

  • Case study examination of regulatory responses to specific genetic technologies (e.g., human cloning).

    • Main Results:

    • Genetic research is progressing at an unprecedented rate, raising significant ethical and social questions.
    • There is a clear and increasing societal demand for regulatory action and government oversight.
    • Legislating genetic policy is complex due to the multifaceted nature of genetic research and its applications.

    Conclusions:

    • Formal government oversight of human genetic research is becoming inevitable.
    • While valid social and ethical concerns warrant regulatory responses, effective policy development is challenging.
    • Balancing scientific innovation with societal values requires careful consideration in genetic policy-making.